Skip to content

Cognitive-motor Training in Parkinson Disease

Cognitive-motor Training on Brain Activity, Cognitive Function, and Walking Ability in People With Parkinson Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06588439
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2025-03-15
Completion date
2027-08-31
Last updated
2025-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Cognitive-motor training, Executive function, Gait, Electroencephalography

Brief summary

Literature reviews showed the cognitive-motor training that combines cognitive tasks may enhance cognitive functions more effectively than individual interventions. Stepping-based cognitive-motor training has been shown to improve cognitive functions, balance, and gait performance in older adults. However, there is insufficient research evidence on the impact and correlation of this training mode on the walking ability, executive functions, and brain activity changes in people with PD. Therefore, this study is designed to investigate the effects of stepping-based cognitive-motor training on the walking ability, executive functions, and brain activity in people with PD.

Interventions

Cognitive-motor training is that cognitive tasks incorporated into motor tasks.

OTHERConventional physiotherapy

Conventional physiotherapy includes stretching, ROM exercise, strengthening exercise, and eye-hand coordination.

Sponsors

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnoses of idiopathic Parkinson disease * Stable dopaminergic medicine ≥ 2 weeks * Able to walk 10 meters without aid * Mini-Mental Status Examination ≥ 24 points * No uncorrected visual or auditory disorders * Education at least junior high school * No other disease may affect balance

Exclusion criteria

* Other medical diagnoses of neurological, musculoskeletal, or cardiopulmonary disorders * History of brain surgery (e.g. deep brain stimulation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trail making testBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionTrail making test contain part A and part B. Faster completing the test indicates better executive function.
Digit span testBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionDigit span test contain forward and backward part. Scores of forward digit span ranges from 0 to 16. Score of backward digit span ranges from 0 to 14. Higher scores indicate better executive function.
Event-related potential - N2Before and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionMeasure event-related potential through electroencephalography under single-task and dual-task paradigm.
Event-related potential - P300Before and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionMeasure event-related potential through electroencephalography under single-task and dual-task paradigm.
Go/Nogo testBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionBehavioral test during measuring electroencephalography.
Gait variabilityBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionUsing GAITRite system to measure the coefficient of variation (CV). The mean and standard deviation will be used to calculate the coefficient of variation (CV). CV = standard deviation / mean \* 100%
Gait speedBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionUsing GAITRite system to measure gait speed
Step lengthBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionUsing GAITRite system to measure step length
Step widthBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionUsing GAITRite system to measure step width
Single support timeBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionUsing GAITRite system to measure single support time
Double support timeBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionUsing GAITRite system to measure double support time
Frontal Assessment BatteryBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionThe score ranged from 0 to 18. Higher scores show better executive function.
Stroop color and word testBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionRecord numbers of corrected color words which the subject responds within 45 sec.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montreal Cognitive AssessmentBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionMontreal Cognitive Assessment ranges from 0 to 30. Higher scores reflect better cognitive performances.
Timed up and go testBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionRecord time of performing timed up and go test
Parkinson Disease QuestionnaireBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionParkinson Disease Questionnaire assess quality of life in people with Parkinson disease. Lower scores reflect higher quality of life.
Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems TestBefore and after 8 weeks of intervention, as well as 4 weeks after interventionMini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test scores range from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate better balance ability.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYea-Ru Yang, PhD
yryang@nycu.edu.tw+886228267279

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026