Skip to content

Efficacy of Different Stretching Techniques on Hamstring Muscle Tightness in IT Professionals

Comparative Effectiveness of Static Stretching Versus Myofascial Release on Hamstring Muscle Tightness in IT Professionals: A Randomized Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06586554
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-09-19
Start date
2020-01-21
Completion date
2020-12-23
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hamstring Flexibility, Hamstring Tightness

Keywords

Functional ability, Static Stretching, Myofascial Release, Hamstring tightness, Hamstring flexibility

Brief summary

Brief Summary This clinical trial aims to learn if static stretching and myofascial release work to improve hamstring muscle tightness and lower limb functional ability among IT professionals. It will also learn about the superiority of one maneuver over another. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does static stretching and myofascial release work to improve hamstring muscle tightness and lower limb functional ability among IT professionals? * Which stretching maneuver is more effective in reducing hamstring muscle tightness and improving the lower limb functional ability among IT professionals? Researchers will compare static stretching to myofascial release to see if both work equally or are superior to each other in reducing hamstring muscle tightness and improving lower limb functional ability among IT professionals. Participants will: * Both groups received an application of hot packs for 20-25mins at the posterior aspect of the thigh. * In addition, group 1 performed static stretching of the hamstring muscles for thirty seconds, with a thirty-second gap, repeating the same maneuver three times/day for five days/week for three weeks. * Group 2 received a myofascial release. This maneuver involves the proper positioning of the practitioner's hands on both sides of the hamstrings, pulling them in opposite directions with firm pressure, and holding the stretch for three to five minutes each stretch, completing five to seven stretches per session with a gap of two minutes between each stretch, and continued five sessions per week for three weeks.

Detailed description

Tightness in the hamstring muscles presents a considerable issue for many people, especially those in professions requiring long sitting periods, such as IT workers. This group often experiences a high rate of hamstring tightness because their jobs involve extended sitting and minimal physical movement. As a result, IT professionals may suffer from limited knee extension and reduced functionality, leading to discomfort and lower productivity at work and in daily activities. The impact of hamstring tightness on knee extension and overall function has been extensively studied across various populations. Limited knee extension, commonly associated with hamstring tightness, can disrupt standard walking patterns and affect joint stability, raising the risk of musculoskeletal injuries, particularly around the knee. Additionally, the reduced functional ability caused by hamstring tightness can negatively influence daily tasks, job performance, and overall quality of life.

Interventions

OTHERStatic stretching

The SS group received static stretching, which was applied with gentle and firm pressure while pulling opposite the hamstring muscle contraction.

OTHERMyofascial release

Myofascial release is applied with cross-handed stretches over hamstring muscle

Sponsors

King Saud University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* IT professionals * males and females) * aged between 30 and 45 years * working in passive roles for at least 6 hours a day, and * reported symptoms of hamstring muscle tightness such as decreased flexibility and discomfort during prolonged sitting, and found positive active knee extension test.

Exclusion criteria

* History of musculoskeletal injuries or neurological disorders affecting lower limb function, and * showed non-cooperation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Active knee extension range of motion (AKE-ROM)3 weeksHamstring muscle tightness was assessed by active knee extension ROM using a standard full-circle goniometer. The knee angle should be between 80-90 degrees. If the range is below 80 degrees, then that subject has a tight hamstring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS)3 weeksLower limb functional ability was assessed using a lower extremity functional scale. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is scored on a scale of 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating better lower limb function. The interpretation of the scores can be based on the following categories: 0-20: Severe functional limitation; 21-40: Moderate functional limitation; 41-60: Mild to moderate functional limitation; 61-80: Minimal functional limitation or normal function.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026