Skip to content

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Structured Education According to Premenstrual Syndrome Symptom Map

The Effectiveness of Structured Training According to the Premenstrual Syndrome Symptom Map

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06585475
Enrollment
101
Registered
2024-09-05
Start date
2023-11-01
Completion date
2024-08-05
Last updated
2024-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education, Menstrual Cycle Disorder, Premenstrual Syndromes

Keywords

life satisfaction, pain, depression, stress, anxiety

Brief summary

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the training structured according to the PMS symptom map. This experimental (randomised-controlled) study was conducted with women of reproductive age with PMS. Women who met the inclusion criteria and volunteered to participate in the study constituted the sample of the study. As a result of block randomisation, 55 women were assigned to the intervention group and 55 women to the control group. Pre-test data were collected from the women allocated to the intervention and control groups by means of data collection tools (VAS pain scoring, DAS depression stress anxiety assessment scale, Premenstrual syndrome assessment scale and premenstrual syndrome-specific life satisfaction scale). The intervention group received a 3-session structured training according to the PMS symptom map, while the control group did not receive any intervention. Women in the intervention group completed the post-test data on the last day of the 2nd cycle after the training, while women in the control group completed the post-test data on the last day of the 2nd cycle after the pre-test.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStructured training according to premenstrual syndrome symptom map

A symptom map consisting of evidence-based practices for coping with PMS symptoms was created. An educational content based on this map was prepared and applied to women with PMS to evaluate whether it was effective compared to the control group.

Sponsors

Sakarya University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Meeting ACOG's PMS diagnostic criteria Being over 18 years of age, Not using psychotherapeutic medications, Not having a mental illness, Not being pregnant, Agreeing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Not having regular menstruation in the last 3 months, Using analgesics during menstruation while participating in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Premenstrual syndrome assessment scalepre-intervention, 2 month after interventiona scale used to measure the degree of premenstrual syndrome
premenstrual syndrome specific life satisfaction scalepre-intervention, 2 month after interventionPremenstrual syndrome specific life satisfaction scale evaluates life satisfaction of women with PMS
DAS depression stress anxiety assessment scalepre-intervention, 2 month after interventionDAS depression stress anxiety assessment scale, evaluates psychological symptoms
VAS pain scorepre-intervention, 2 month after intervention1.421 / 5.000 VAS pain score measures pain score

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 17, 2026