Skip to content

tVNS in Long COVID-19

Use of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Reducing the Symptoms of Long COVID Patients Who Fulfill Diagnostic Criteria for ME/CFS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06585254
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-09-05
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Long COVID

Keywords

Medically unexplained illness, Vagus Nerve

Brief summary

A prior open label study has shown that transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation \[tVNS\] can improve the health of some patients with postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), severely affected enough to also fulfill criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). The purpose of this study is to compare two sets of stimulus parameters to determine the one that best improves the health-related quality of life of these patients over a period of 6-weeks. Patients using their assigned device for at least 30 of the 42 possible opportunities will receive the best device for an additional 6-week period.

Detailed description

While the US has officially said the SARS CoV-2 emergency is over, the country is left with a residual of patients who continue to experience Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS CoV-2 infection -- PASC. Unfortunately, despite a major effort to understand PASC via the NIH Researching Covid to Enhance Recovery program, no specific treatment has emerged and only a limited number of new trials has been initiated. The purpose of this proposal is to perform a clinical trial of noninvasive, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation \[tVNS\] in an attempt to find the best tVNS treatment for these patients. The need for the proposed trial is supported by an earlier open label tVNS trial in 15 PASC patients who also fulfilled the 1994 case criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome \[ME/CFS but for simplicity CFS\]. The research team chose patients with PASC-CFS for two reasons: first, CFS following Covid infection is probably the most common subgroup of patients with PASC. In the study, of 41 PASC patients whose continued symptoms over time lead to their being referred for cardiopulmonary exercise tests, 47% fulfilled the 1994 case criteria for the diagnosis of CFS. Second, the research team limited the tVNS pilot to PASC-CFS to reduce the heterogeneity inherent in the diagnosis of PASC. The research team specifically recruited non-hospitalized patients with documented Covid who remained ill with fatigue, widespread pain, cognitive complaints, and post-exertional malaise for at least 6 months after the acute infection, thus fulfilling the 1994 case criteria for CFS. Importantly, the entire study was done remotely without requiring participants to come into the medical center or stop current medical treatments. The research team proposes to extend this study to inform us which of two possible ways of stimulating the vagus is the most effective in improving the health of PASC-CFS patients. The study again will be done remotely with the study team having access to large databases of non-hospitalized PASC sufferers. After determination that a patient had Covid, continued ill with PASC and now fulfills criteria for the diagnosis of CFS, the participant will be asked to respond to questionnaires via RedCap as to magnitude of fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, widespread pain and/or post-exertional malaise, as well as their functional status. Each will then be randomized into Treatment A or B and sent the device for these two treatment limbs with instructions to use the device for 35 min a day in the morning over a 6-week period. During the fifth week of study participation, participants will receive a stick-on device \[as well as instructions via zoom\] to allow them to use the device to provide data on heart rate variability - an objective measure of treatment success. Participants will do this for a 6-minute period in the afternoon and then return the device to the study team. Participants will complete questionnaires on RedCap at the end of the first 6-week phase and return the device to the study team to determine usage. Participants will be told they must use their device for at least 30 of the 42 days in order to get access to the device that gave the best clinical outcome for an additional 6-weeks. At the end of this second 6-week period, participants will again complete questionnaires and return their device to the study team.

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulator

A device attached to the tragus of the ear which when activated stimulates an ascending branch of the vagus nerve

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A computer-generated randomization list will be used to assign subjects into Treatment A or Treatment B. Study team members doing outcome assessments will be blinded to treatment allocation.

Intervention model description

Randomized 6-week trial of two stimulus parameters in improving the health of PASC patients with CFS. Based on participation, then an additional 6 weeks using the device that had the best outcome in improving the health of PASC patients with CFS.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have had documented Covid infection and then fulfill 2015 case definition for ME/CFS * Chalder Fatigue Scale score of 4 or greater * SF-36 Physical Function scale score ≤70 * VAS values of 3 or higher from 0 \[none\] 3 \[substantial\] to 5 \[very severe burden\] on at least two of the following symptoms - fatigue; widespread pain, brain fog, post-exertional malaise

Exclusion criteria

* BMI ≥30 * Hospitalized for COVID-19 infection * BMI ≥30 * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ)Baseline, at 6 week (end of blinded phase), and at 12 weeks (end of open label phase)The Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) is used as a measure of fatigue. The CFQ consists of 11 items and uses likert scoring 0, 1, 2, 3, providing a full scale range of 0-33, where lowest score is least fatigue.
Change in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline, at 6 week (end of blinded phase), and at 12 weeks (end of open label phase)The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey consisting of 36 questions. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. SF-36 will be assessed for physical function score improved from baseline by 0.6 SD or 14%.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measuring FatigueBaseline, at 6 week (end of blinded phase), and at 12 weeks (end of open label phase)VAS total scale from 0-5 scoring system \[0 none; 1 mild; 2 moderate; 3 substantial; 4 severe; 5 very severe\]. Higher score indicates poorer health outcome.
VAS to measure Widespread PainBaseline, at 6 week (end of blinded phase), and at 12 weeks (end of open label phase)VAS total scale from 0-5 scoring system \[0 none; 1 mild; 2 moderate; 3 substantial; 4 severe; 5 very severe\]. Higher score indicates poorer health outcome.
VAS measuring Postexertional malaise (PEM)Baseline, at 6 week (end of blinded phase), and at 12 weeks (end of open label phase)VAS total scale from 0-5 scoring system \[0 none; 1 mild; 2 moderate; 3 substantial; 4 severe; 5 very severe\]. Higher score indicates poorer health outcome.
VAS measuring brain fogBaseline, at 6 week (end of blinded phase), and at 12 weeks (end of open label phase)VAS total scale from 0-5 scoring system \[0 none; 1 mild; 2 moderate; 3 substantial; 4 severe; 5 very severe\]. Higher score indicates poorer health outcome.
Global Clinical Assessment of ChangeAt 6 week (end of blinded phase) and at 12 weeks (end of open label phase)Global Clinical Assessment of Change --+3 or +2 on a scale ranging from +3 \[very much improved\] thru 0 \[no change\] to -3 \[very much worse\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)Baseline and at 5-6 week (end of blinded phase)Participants will attach a device invented by the co-investigator which detects ECG and can quantify R-R intervals compute root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) between normal heartbeats. The RMSSD reflects the beat-to-beat variance in heart rate and is the primary time-domain measure used to estimate the vagally mediated changes reflected in heart rate (HR).

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBenjamin H Natelson, MD

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

STUDY_DIRECTORAnna Norweg, PhD

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026