ACL, ACL Injury
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in graft failure between patients that underwent ACL reconstruction using allograft tendons and patients that underwent ACL reconstruction using autograft tendons in patients older than 40 y.o. and after at least 2 years of follow-up. The hypothesis of the study is that there will be a difference in graft failure and patient reported functional outcomes between allograft and autograft ACL reconstruction.
Interventions
Patients that underwent ACL reconstruction using either allograft or autograft tendons, at least 2 years of follow-up, gender male and female, no comorbidities
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * Male and female patients of fertile age can be recruited * Patients aged 40 years old and above, and 2 years minimum of follow-up * Patients that underwent primary ACL reconstruction with allograft an autograft tendons
Exclusion criteria
* Multiligamentous lesion * Meniscal tear leading to subtotal or total meniscectomy or meniscal graft * Indication for major cartilage restoration or resurfacing * Ipsilateral knee fractures * History of ligament injury * Concomitant extracapsular procedures * Ipsilateral or contralateral knee surgeries
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the difference in graft failure between allograft vs autograft ACL reconstruction | from 2 years after surgical procedure | Clinical evaluation measuring the percentage in graft failure between allograft and autograft ACL reconstruction |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the difference in patient reported outcome between allograft vs autograft ACL reconstruction | from 2 years after surgical procedure | Clinical evaluation collecting Tegner Lysholm Score (max, 100 - min. 0) (100 = no disability; 0= maximum siability) |
Countries
Italy