Gastroparesis, Nausea, Vomiting
Conditions
Brief summary
Background: Gastric electrical stimulation applied by a surgically implanted device effectively alleviates upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the majority of individuals with medically refractory gastroparesis. Despite its efficacy, the mechanisms of action have been minimally explored in previous studies, and it is unknown why some individuals experience limited symptom-lowering effects. Aim: The investigators aim to investigate two of the potential mechanisms of action leading to symptom-reducing effects of gastric electrical stimulation: 1) possible central effects in the brainstem and brain by enhanced parasympathetic vagal activity, and 2) peripheral effects in the stomach by improved gastric accommodation. Methods: Up to thirty individuals with drug-refractory gastroparesis having an implanted gastric electrical stimulator will be enrolled in this cross-sectional and observational study. Of these, 15 will be responders (substantial symptomatic improvement) and 15 non-responders (minor symptomatic improvement). Electroencephalography (EEG) will evaluate the stimulation-induced activity in the brain and brainstem to assess whether the gastric stimulation generates evoked potentials. Electrocardiography (ECG) will investigate stimulation-induced changes in the autonomic regulation of the heart. Gastric ultrasound will investigate the effect of stimulation on stomach accommodation, contractions, and wall tension. These central and peripheral measures will be assessed during one study day before and after activating the gastric electrical stimulator, following an increase in stimulation intensity and post-meal consumption. Furthermore, results will be compared between responders and non-responders. Perspectives: Adjusting the parameters of gastric electrical stimulation based on objective markers in the brain, heart, or stomach, rather than relying on symptom fluctuations, may enhance the effectiveness of symptom improvement. In the future, these objective markers may aid in differentiating between responders and non-responders, which may lead to optimised selection criteria for surgery.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEffect of different gastric electrical stimulator stimulation paragdimes on brain, heart, and stomach.
Measuring EEG, ECG, and ultrasound in both groups during different stimulation intensities provided by the previously implanted gastric electrical stimulator.
Sponsors
Aalborg University Hospital
Aarhus University Hospital
University of Aarhus
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18 and above * Able to read and understand Danish * Have an implanted gastric electrical stimulator for treating gastroparesis * Answering 0 or 1 (non-responders) or 3 or 4 (responders) on the Likert scale describing the symptom improvement gained by gastric electrical stimulation. * Personally signed and dated the informed consent documents (Informeret samtykke) indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial * Are willing and able to comply with the scheduled visit and trial procedures
Exclusion criteria
* Previous surgery on the vagus nerve, including cervical vagotomy * Prior thoracic, abdominal or brain surgeries that, in the opinion of the investigator, could limit data collection or interpretation. * Previous diagnosis or history of orthostatic intolerance, e.g. POTS, neurocardiogenic syncope, orthostatic hypotension or autonomic dysfunction. * Patients with an implanted cardiac device (e.g. pacemaker, CRT, etc.) or vagal nerve stimulator (VNS). * History of neurological disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, could limit data collection or interpretation. * Participants with any clinical abnormalities that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the risk associated with trial participation or may interfere with the interpretation of the trial results
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evoked brain potentials | 5min during maximum stimulation intensity | Amplitude of evoked brain potentials induced by gastric electrical stimulation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Meal-related EEG measures | 5min | EEG frequency distribution in response to an ingested meal when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes. |
| ECG measures between ON/OFF stimulation | 5min | Heart rate variability, periodic repolarisation dynamic, and the deceleration capacity of the heart rate when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes. |
| ECG measures between stimulation intensities | 5min | Heart rate variability, periodic repolarisation dynamic, and the deceleration capacity of the heart rate following different stimulation intensities. |
| Meal-related ECG measures | 5min | Heart rate variability, periodic repolarisation dynamic, and the deceleration capacity of the heart rate in response to an ingested meal when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes. |
| EEG measures between ON/OFF stimulation | 5min | EEG frequency distribution when comparing the OFF and ON stimulation modes |
| Meal-related gastric tension | 5min | Gastric tension in response to an ingested meal comparing OFF and ON stimulation. |
| Meal-related gastric contraction frequency | 5min | Gastric contraction frequency in response to an ingested meal comparing OFF and ON stimulation. |
| Symptoms and gastric measures | 5min | Correlation between gastroparesis symptoms (Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index) and changes in gastric accommodation/tension when turning the stimulation ON after meal ingestion. |
| Meal-related gastric accomodation | 5min | Gastric accommodation in response to an ingested meal comparing OFF and ON stimulation. |
Countries
Denmark
Contacts
Primary ContactDitte Kornum, MD
Backup ContactAsbjørn Drewes, MD
Outcome results
None listed