Various Techniques of Horizontal Ridge Augmentation

Decompression Technique Versus Ridge Splitting and Ethoss Bone Regeneration in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06580626

Enrollment

Registered

2024-08-30

Start date

2023-07-01

Completion date

2024-08-01

Last updated

2024-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Horizontal Ridge Deficiency

Brief summary

42 patients will be selected from the Outpatient Clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University for replacement of missed single tooth or multiple teeth in posterior mandible by dental implant in horizontally atrophic ridge.

Interventions

PROCEDUREdecompression technique

14 implants will be placed in patients of missing single tooth or multiple teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.

PROCEDUREguided bone regenaration using Ethoss

14 implants will be placed in patients of missing single tooth or multiple teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by guided bone regeneration using β-TCP/CS synthetic bone substitute.

PROCEDUREridge splitting technqiue

14 implants will be placed in patients of missing single tooth or multiple teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by ridge splitting technique using piezosurgery.

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient's cooperation, motivation and good oral hygiene. * Patient medically free from systemic diseases that absolutely contraindicate implant surgery. * Moderately atrophic posterior mandibular alveolar ridge width (more than 4 mm), with minimum 10 mm height. * Free from history of bruxism / parafunctional habits.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with local pathological disease such as cyst, tumor at the planned surgical site. * Pregnant patients. * Heavy smoker patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Alveolar ridge width.	1 year	Overall width of the ridge was evaluated preoperatively, after implant placement immediately, after 6, and 12 months postoperative

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026