Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
Primary Health Care, Management
Brief summary
New sustainable models of patient-focused and team-based care for patients with hypertension should be developed to achieve health improvements and cost-efficiency. The aim of this project is to evaluate new ways of sustainable hypertension (HT) management in primary care, starting with a pilot study at 2 Primary Health Care Centres (PHCCs). At intervention PHCCs cardiovascular risk is assessed with SCORE2 for all hypertension patients. The staff receives education on HT treatment and an easy-to-follow treatment protocol. Non-physicians lead patient education on HT in groups. Patients receive a home blood pressure (BP) monitor and communicate digitally with the assigned nurse on medication update, blood and urinary tests and follow up. The nurse consults with the physician if needed. Regular face to face visits with the physician are only scheduled for patients with high cardiovascular risk or end organ damage, otherwise for all patients if needed. At the control PHCs hypertension care continues as usual. All participants will be asked to complete questionnaires after 6 and 24 months. Outcomes are feasibility for the pilot study and the proportion of patients reaching BP target plus change in systolic BP, cardiovascular risk factors, patients´ and staff´s grade of satisfaction and knowledge, and health care costs for the main study, compared between intervention and control PHCCS. Results will help to establish sustainable models of treating HT patients in Primary Care.
Interventions
Hypertension management based on cardiovascular risk assessment. For details see description of study arm intervention.
Hypertension Management as usual
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
\- Adult patients with hypertension
Exclusion criteria
* secondary hypertension according to the medical records at the Primary Health Care Center * terminal illness * pregnancy-induced hypertension * cognitive impairment * impaired vision (not able to read measurements for the home BP measurements or communicate via 1177 direct digitally) * psychotic disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Blood pressure change | 6 months | change in proportion of patients reaching blood pressure target of \<140/90 mmHg |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participants grade of satisfaction | 24 months | Questionnaires. 7 point Likert Scale: Level of Satisfaction - 7 point 1. \- Completely dissatisfied 2. \- Mostly dissatisfied 3. \- Somewhat dissatisfied 4. \- neither satisfied or dissatisfied 5. \- Somewhat satisfied 6. \- Mostly satisfied 7. \- Completely satisfied |
| Staffs grade of satisfaction | 24 months | Questionnaires. 7 point Likert Scale: Level of Satisfaction - 7 point 1. \- Completely dissatisfied 2. \- Mostly dissatisfied 3. \- Somewhat dissatisfied 4. \- neither satisfied or dissatisfied 5. \- Somewhat satisfied 6. \- Mostly satisfied 7. \- Completely satisfied |
| Blood glucose level and cholesterol | 24 months | Change in mean blood glucose level (mmol/l), mean LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l), mean HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) |
| Health economic evaluation | 24 months | Estimation of the ICER values (cost per unit of effect). Calculation of QALY, based on EQ5D (questionnaires). Comparison of ICER per QALY with values from the National Board of Health and Welfare |
| Kidney complications | 24 months | Change in % of patients with microalbuminuria (U-albumin/kreatinin-kvot (mg/mmol) 3,0-30) |
| Smoking | 24 months | Change in % of patients who smoke) |
| Kidney function | 24 months | Change in mean eGFR (ml/min/1,73 m2) |
Countries
Sweden