Skip to content

Comparing Sennosid A+B and Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation

Sennosid A+B Versus Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation; A Prospective Randomized Observer-Blinded Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06580366
Enrollment
600
Registered
2024-08-30
Start date
2024-08-22
Completion date
2025-03-22
Last updated
2024-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bowel Preparation

Keywords

Bowel preparation, Colonoscopy, sennosid A+B, Sodium Picosulfate

Brief summary

Colonoscopy Preparation: Comparing Sennoside A+B and PM/Ca Colonoscopy is a test used to examine the inside of the bowel. Proper bowel preparation is crucial because it helps doctors get a clear view during the procedure. What is Sennoside A+B? Sennoside A+B is a type of laxative made from the senna plant. It works by stimulating the bowel to move and reducing the absorption of water, making it easier to pass stools. Research has shown that high doses of sennoside A+B can be effective for bowel preparation. Sennoside A+B vs. PEG: Some studies have found that sennoside A+B is more effective than PEG, another laxative, but can cause more abdominal pain. Other studies have found no significant difference in effectiveness between the two. What is Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid (PM/Ca)? PM/Ca is a combination of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid. Sodium picosulfate stimulates bowel movements, while magnesium oxide and citric acid help increase water in the bowel, making it easier to pass stools. PM/Ca vs. PEG: Research has shown that PM/Ca is as effective as PEG for bowel preparation. Patients using PM/Ca generally tolerate the preparation process better than those using PEG. Conclusion: While PEG is the preferred option according to guidelines, its high cost can make it less accessible in some places. In this study, we aim to compare the effectiveness and patient tolerance of Sennoside A+B and PM/Ca since no direct comparison between these two preparations has been made before.

Detailed description

Colonoscopy is an endoscopic imaging method used to examine the lumen and mucosa of the bowel. It is the gold standard method used for colorectal cancer screening and the detection of most colorectal pathologies. Successful bowel preparation is one of the key factors for a successful colonoscopic examination. Sennoside A+B is a stimulant laxative derived from the senna plant (Cassia senna). Studies have shown that after senna is ingested, it is activated by the gut flora, directly interacts with the intestinal mucosa, stimulates bowel movements, and inhibits the absorption of electrolytes and water. High doses of senna have been shown to be beneficial as a bowel preparation agent. There are many studies in the literature comparing senna compounds with polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions. In a randomized controlled study conducted by Coskun et al. on 474 patients, it was found that bowel cleansing was better with sennoside A+B compared to PEG, but abdominal pain was more common in the senna group. Another randomized controlled study conducted by Shavakhi et al. on 322 patients found no difference in effectiveness between the two agents. Drugs containing sodium picosulfate-magnesium oxide-citric acid (PM/Ca) are laxative agents recommended for colonoscopy preparation in ESGE and ASGE guidelines. While sodium picosulfate acts as a stimulant laxative, magnesium oxide and citric acid act as osmotic laxatives. In the SEE CLEAR II randomized controlled trial comparing PM/Ca with PEG, PM/Ca was found to be as effective as PEG. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of side effects, but participants using PM/Ca tolerated the bowel preparation procedure much better. The ASGE and ESGE guidelines primarily recommend PEG solutions for colon preparation. However, due to the lack of reimbursement by the Social Security Institution (SGK) in our country and the resulting cost, access to PEG treatment is difficult for patients. For these reasons, other treatments recommended in the available guidelines are used more frequently in our country. Although there are many studies in the literature comparing PM/Ca and sennoside A+B preparations with PEG and other preparations in terms of efficacy for bowel preparation, no study has directly compared PM/Ca with sennoside A+B to date. We aimed to compare the efficacy and patient tolerance of these two commonly used preparations in our country.

Interventions

DRUGSodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid

Bowel Preparation

DRUGSennosid A+B

Bowel Preparation

Sponsors

Hitit University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18-80 years scheduled for elective outpatient colonoscopy. * Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* History of intra-abdominal surgery. * Chronic kidney failure. * Congestive heart failure. * Chronic liver failure. * Inflammatory bowel disease. * Electrolyte imbalance. * Hospitalized patients. * Patients unable to use the bowel preparation treatment * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to Sennoside A+B or PM/Ca components * Known gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sennosid A+B versus Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Oxide/Citric Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized Observer-Blinded Study4 monthsEffectiveness of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). The BBPS is a standardized 9-point assessment scale for the colon. The structure of the colon is divided into its three segments: right colon, transverse colon, and left colon. Each segment is classified from 0 to 3 depending on the degree of soiling. The sum total of the three segments represents the degree of soiling, so that a total ≤ 5 points shows poor bowel preparation, while 6-7 shows good bowel preparation, and ≥ 8 very good bowel preparation. The investigators will consider patients with a score of 6 or higher as successful.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary Contactİbrahim Durak
durak.ibrahim@gmail.com+903642193000
Backup Contactİbrahim Durak
+903642193000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 16, 2026