Skip to content

Colorectal Anastomosis Outcomes Using the Novel Powered Circular Stapler Compared With Manual Circular Staplers.

Colorectal Anastomosis Outcomes Using the Novel Powered Circular Stapler Compared With Manual Circular Staplers. A Randomized Multicentre Controlled Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06578065
Enrollment
540
Registered
2024-08-29
Start date
2024-06-27
Completion date
2027-09-01
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Anastomosis

Brief summary

Patients whom meet all eligibility criteria will be assigned random 1:1 to one of the following arms: * ECPS group: Echelon Circular™ Powered Stapler (n=270) * MCS Group: manual circular staplers (n=270) Patients will be followed during 30 days in order to evaluate the primary endpoint.

Detailed description

Anastomotic Leakage (AL) is the complication that most concerns colorectal surgeons. It leads to prolonged postoperative stay, increased costs, risk of reoperations and a permanent colostomy, together with an increase in morbidity and mortality. The novel Echelon Circular™ Powered Stapler (ECPS) (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA), introduces design changes that could decrease the rate of technical errors and improve clinical outcomes. The powered stapler decreases the force needed on firing the device, improving stability at the anastomotic site. Atraumatic Gripping Surface Technology reduces the compressive forces on tissues, and along with 3D Stapling Technology allows a better compression distribution throughout the anastomosis and a better hemostasis. This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled with parallel groups clinical trial, with 8 participant sites in total (4 sites in Spain and 4 sites in France), to include an approximate sample size (n) of 570 patients who will undergo a colorectal anastomosis after Hartmann reversal, left colectomy, sigmoidectomy or anterior rectal resection, for benign or malignant pathology. 540 patients assigned randomly 1:1 to assess whether technical improvements of Echelon Circular™ Powered Stapler (ECPS) have an impact on left-sided colorectal Anastomotic Leakage (AL) rate compared to current manual circular staplers (MCS). Anastomosis could be performed open, laparoscopically or with robotic assistance. After surgery, patients will be followed during 30 days in order to evaluate the primary endpoint.

Interventions

DEVICEEchelon Circular™ Powered Stapler

Echelon Circular™ Powered Stapler will be used in colorectal anastomosis.

DEVICE2-row circular staplers manual

2-row circular staplers manual will be used in colorectal anastomosis.

Sponsors

Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled with parallel groups clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient or its legal representative informed consent. * Age ≥ 18 years. * Patients who will undergo a colorectal anastomosis after left colectomy, sigmoidectomy or anterior rectal resection, for benign or malignant pathology (NOTE: Hartmann reversal cases also included).

Exclusion criteria

* Diverting stoma. * Emergency surgery. * American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ IV. * Transanal total mesorectal excision approach.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anastomotic leakage rates differences between both groups at 30 postoperative daysThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTo assess whether ECPS have an impact on left-sided colorectal AL rate compared to current manual circular staplers (MCS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative endoluminal bleeding rate differences between both groups.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearTo assess whether ECPS improve haemostasis in the anastomotic line
Morbidity differences between groups according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearTo evaluate whether ECPS have an impact in postoperative morbidity
Re-intervention rate differences between both groupsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTo evaluate whether ECPS have an impact in re-interventions rate

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTVicente Pla Martí
vplamarti@yahoo.es+34 669204303

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026