Skip to content

The Analgesic Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block With Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block With Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block in Hip Hemiarthroplasty

A Comparative Study Between the Analgesic Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) With Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (LFCN) and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) With Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIC) in Hip Hemiarthroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06577103
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-08-29
Start date
2024-01-02
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Hemiarthroplasty, Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block, Pericapsular Nerve Group Block, Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficiency of preoperative and post-operative analgesia by pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) block with supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIC) block compared with PENG block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN) block in ease of giving a sitting position for spinal anesthesia and reducing narcotic consumption during the first 24 hour post-operatively and functional recovary by using the Visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain.

Detailed description

The established practice to decrease pain using opioids in hip fracture surgery may result in compromised outcomes in the frail and elderly population with nausea-vomiting, constipation, delirium and respiratory depression. This popularized the regional analgesic techniques in the surgical treatment of hip fractures. Femoral nerve (FN) and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIC) block are documented to provide good peri-operative analgesia with reduced need for opioids. The latest pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) block, is an interfacial plane block targeting the articular branches of the femoral, obturator (ON) and accessory obturator nerves (AON) at the hip. An ability to perform in supine positioning, which is especially important in patients with acute hip fractures or chronic pain is an indigenous advantage of PENG block. Due to the blockade of only sensory articular branches, substantial motor weakness is unexpected. But exclusive use of PENG block for analgesia in hip fracture patients is not sufficient as it doesn't involve the cutaneous pain-generating area supplied by the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN).

Interventions

OTHERPericapsular nerve group block (PENG) with supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIC)

Patients will receive pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFIC) block.

OTHERPericapsular nerve group block (PENG) with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCN)

Patients will receive pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 40-80 years. * Sex: Both sexes. * American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I, II, and III. * Scheduled for hip hemiarthroplasty under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Declining to give a written informed consent. * History of allergy to the medications used in the study. * Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including patient refusal, coagulopathy and local infection). * Psychiatric disorders or narcotic abusers. * Significant cognitive dysfunction. * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class IV. * Renal insufficiency (to avoid local anesthetic or nalbuphine metabolites adverse effect) * Opioid abuser patients * Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Degree of pain24 hours postoperativelyDegree of pain will be assessed by visual analogue score (VAS). VAS ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain. It will be assessed preoperatively first after the block application then postoperatively, at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and then 2, 6 ,12 ,18 ,24 hours postoperatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The ease of giving a sitting position for spinal anesthesia (EOSP)IntraoperativelyThe ease of giving a sitting position for spinal anesthesia (EOSP) will be assessed by the EOSP score .EOSP was assessed on the scale of 0-3 (0 = unable to position, 1 = patient had abnormal posturing due to pain and required support for positioning, 2 = mild discomfort but does not require support for positioning, 3 = optimal condition where the patient was able to position himself
The total dose of nalbuphine consumption24 hours postoperativelyWhen visual analogue score (VAS) \>/=4, patients will receive injection nalbuphine 10 mg/70 kg (with maximum dose 160 mg over 24 hours) intravenously.
The number of patients who needed rescue analgesia24 hours postoperativelyNumber of patients who needed rescue analgesia will be recorded
Ablility to walk with support within 24 hours24 hours postoperativelyThe ability of patients to walk with support will be recorded

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026