Skip to content

High-intensity Interval Circuit Training in People With Parkinson Disease

Comparison of High-intensity Interval Circuit Training With Upper Extremity and Lower Extremity Training Versus Lower Extremity Training Alone in People With Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06576817
Enrollment
64
Registered
2024-08-29
Start date
2024-02-15
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

exercise

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to compare different types of high intensity circuit exercises over an 8-class training series in people with Parkinson disease. The main question it aims to answer is: -Does including arm and hand exercises with leg exercises improve reaction time, balance, functional measures, gait speed and quality of life? This group will be compared to a group that only does leg exercises. Participants will be asked to participate in 8 high intensity circuit exercise classes.

Detailed description

People with Parkinson disease will be recruited from the community and randomized into 2 equal groups: high intensity interval circuit training with lower extremity (LE) and lower and upper extremity (LEUE) training. The study will be composed of a baseline assessment, 8 group class sessions, and a post-intervention assessment. The baseline assessment will include demographics, disease and fall history and outcome measure collection. Group class sessions will include concurrent group warmup, followed by an 8-station circuit performed with high intensity intervals, and a cool-down. The circuit will include 4 stations performed by both the LE and LEUE groups and 4 stations specific to each intervention group, including 4 additional LE exercise stations for the LE group and 4 UE specific stations for the LEUE group. The stations that differ will not be adjacent to one another nor specifically indicated as different. The stations that differ will mirror similar aspects of function (ie, strength, reaction time, etc.) for the UE and LE stations. Participants will be told exercise stations may vary within-session and week to week but will not be informed that only one group has UE exercise interventions. After conclusion of the class series, post-intervention balance and stepping outcomes will be reassessed.

Interventions

OTHERHigh intensity circuit exercise class - Lower and upper extremity

Exercises performed at high intensity effort in the circuit (8 total) will focus on both the lower extremity (4) and upper extremity (4)

OTHERHigh intensity circuit exercise class - Lower extremity alone

All exercises performed at high intensity effort in the circuit (8 total) will focus on the lower extremity alone

Sponsors

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will be told exercise stations may vary within-session and week to week but will not be informed that only one group has UE exercise interventions. Assessors are blinded to group allocation.

Intervention model description

Single center, two arm, pre-test post-test parallel design with up to 4 cohorts of class participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of Parkinson's disease * Hoehn and Yahr level of 1 to 3 * ability to walk independently with or without an assistive device * obtain medical clearance to participate in moderate or vigorous exercise.

Exclusion criteria

* diagnosis of any neurological disease other than PD (including but not limited to stroke, dementia, and multiple sclerosis; mild cognitive impairment is not excluded) * bone instability (non-consolidated fractures, unstable spinal column, severe osteoporosis) * muscle or ligament tears * uncontrolled hypertension * uncontrolled diabetes * severe cardiovascular disease that impairs walking or exercise * a major change in medication during the study training period (pre-test to post-test)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trail making Test Parts A and B (timed, higher scores mean worse outcome)8-10 weeksCognitive and fine motor skills
Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale (0-100%, higher scores mean better outcome)8-10 weeksBalance confidence self-report
Timed Up and Go8-10 weeksBalance and function
10 meter Walk Test8-10 weeksGait Speed
6 minute walk test8-10 weeksendurance
9-hole peg test (timed, higher scores mean worse outcome)8-10 weeksfine motor
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - Short Form (8) (Score 0-32, higher scores mean worse outcome)8-10 weeksQuality of Life

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTiffany B Salido, DPT, PhD

Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026