Mind-Body Therapies
Conditions
Brief summary
Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) capture conditions characterized by symptoms without corresponding objective findings, such as asthenia, low back pain, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, or chronic fatigue syndrome. In order to establish the grounds for a RCT. this pilot study aims to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of a 5-week breathing retraining programme on patients who meet the criteria for MUPS.
Detailed description
Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are symptoms without an identifiable organic cause that lead to functional impairment. MUPS is highly prevalent in general practice consultations. This pilot study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of a 5-week breathing retraining program for patients meeting the criteria for MUPS. The study used a quantitative observational design with pre- and post-intervention measurements. Fifteen participants with MUPS and dysfunctional breathing (assessed by the Nijmegen Questionnaire) were recruited from two general practitioner offices. The intervention consisted of 5 weekly sessions including education on breathing physiology and weekly breathing exercises focused on nasal breathing and resonance breathing techniques. One week post intervention, improvements were observed in dysfunctional breathing scores, lower symptom severity, higher general well-being, and reduced musculoskeletal pain complaints. At 3 months post-intervention, sustained improvements were seen in dysfunctional breathing, general well-being, musculoskeletal pain, and additionally lower pseudoneurological, gastrointestinal, and allergy complaints, as well as lower overall symptom burden and improved end-tidal CO2 levels. The study concluded that the 5-week breathing program showed promising results for improving multiple patient-reported outcomes in MUPS. Recruitment, adherence, and acceptability of the program were satisfactory. A randomized controlled trial is recommended to further evaluate the efficacy of this breathing intervention for MUPS patients.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALBreathing excercizes
The intervention comprised six sessions. The first week involved obtaining informed consent, taking measurements and providing a brief introduction to breath and coherent breathing exercises. This was followed by four weekly sessions, each consisting of 90 minutes combining lectures and breathing exercises. At the final session, measurements and feasibility data were collected.
Sponsors
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University of New South Wales
University of Agder
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Masking description
The principal investigator kept all records and collected data, which was blinded from the care provider, whose role was solely to perform lectures and exercises.,
Intervention model description
Pilot and fesability study.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years * dysfunctional breathing, * sufficient laguage skills to fill out forms
Exclusion criteria
* Participants with asthma * Participants with,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * Participants with respiratory allergy that is not optimally treated medically.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Nijmegen Questionnaire | Base line, end of intervention, and 3 months post-interventions | To detect dysfunctional breathing (DB). The NQ consists of 16 questions ranked on a five-point Likert scale where never counts as 0 and very often counts as 4, giving a total DB score between 0-64. Healthy, asymptomatic individuals generally have a DB score between 7-12. A score above 19 is suggestive of DB. |
| Subjective Health Complaints Inventory | Base line, end of intervention, and 3 months post-interventions | Measures 29 subjective health problems. The form lists 29 common somatic and psychological ailments, where the degree of complaints and duration must be stated for the last 30 days, graded on a four-point scale. The 29 individual health issues were grouped into five sub-issues \[musculoskeletal pain (8 items), pseudoneurology (7 items), gastrointestinal disorders (7 items), allergic disorders (5 items), colds (2 items)\], and a total score comprising all items. All scales were scored 0-100 (where 0 indicates no symptom pressure and 100 the highest possible symptom pressure). |
| Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile | Base line, end of intervention, and 3 months post-interventions | Participants are asked to rate four items (symptom 1, symptom 2, well-being, and impact of symptoms on their daily activity status) on a scale of 0-6 where 0 is As good as it could be and 6 is As bad as it could be. Participants report one or two symptoms (physical or mental) which bother them the most, consider how bad each symptom was during the last week, and score them accordingly. They also report how much these symptoms affected a particular activity, their well-being during the last week, use of medication, and any possible adverse effects or worsening of symptoms. The symptom pressure and general well-being (scales 0-6) are presented. |
| Carbon dioxide levels | Base line, end of intervention, and 3 months post-interventions | End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) (Microstream™) is an objective measure of hyperventilation and is easily detected through a nasal cannula with a capnograph together with respiratory rate (RR). The normal values of EtCO2 are 4.7 kPa - 6 kPa (45). Values below 4.6 are regarded as hypocapnia. |
| Heart rate variability | Base line, end of intervention, and 3 months post-interventions | The registrations of HRV were performed using HeartMath with the participants in a sitting position, relaxed, and breathing regularly. In the 1990s, HeartMath Institute researchers identified a physiological state called heart coherence. Physiologically, the coherence state is marked by the development of a smooth, sine-wave-like pattern in the heart rate variability trace. This characteristic pattern, called heart rhythm coherence, is the primary indicator of the psychophysiological coherence state. The emWave Coherence score is a measure of the degree of coherence in the heart rhythm pattern. A coherent heart rhythm is a stable, regular, repeating rhythm resembling a sine wave at a single frequency between 0.04 - 0.24 Hz (3 - 15 cycles per minute). The more stable and regular the heart rhythm frequency, the higher the coherence score. Scores range from 0 - 16. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient adherence and attrition rates | Base line, end of intervention, and 3 months post-interventions | Number of patients |
Countries
Norway
Outcome results
None listed