Skip to content

Effect of a New HA Filler in Correcting Nasolabial Fold

New HA Filler Versus Juvederm for Nasolabial Fold Correction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06574750
Enrollment
74
Registered
2024-08-28
Start date
2021-10-16
Completion date
2023-05-08
Last updated
2024-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging Problems

Brief summary

The investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new HA filler for nasolabial fold correction

Detailed description

A 24-week prospective, single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized, split-face study was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of new HA filler versus Juvederm for nasolabial fold correction

Interventions

DRUGCUREAⓇ (ARIBIO, Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea)

Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.

DRUGJuvedermⓇ (Q-Med AB, Uppsala, Sweden)

Hyaluronic acid filler injection were administered into the mid-dermis of the nasolabial fold.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who had prominent NLFs with a WSRS score of 3 or 4 on both sides

Exclusion criteria

* patients with active facial skin diseases or history of severe allergies, autoimmune disorders, or hypersensitivity to HA or any of the excipients contained in the investigational filler * participants who had used a local topical preparation (steroid and retinoid) within 2 weeks before the study * participants who had undergone chemical peeling, laser procedures, or acne treatments within 4 months before the study * participants who had been injected with other biomaterials, including HA within 6 months before the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WSRSat 24 weeks after treatmentWrinkle Severity Rating Scale from 1 (no visible fold) to 5 (extremely deep and long folds)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GAISat 24 weeks after treatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale from 3 (very much improved) to -1 (worse).
Adverse events related to the procedureup to 24 weeksPatients were required to report any adverse events up to 24 weeks

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026