Skip to content

Differences In The Severity Of Diabetic Neuropathy Based On Electromyography In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With And Without Comorbidities

Differences In The Severity Of Diabetic Neuropathy Based On Electromyography In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With And Without Comorbidities

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06573684
Acronym
DISNEY-T2DM
Enrollment
78
Registered
2024-08-27
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2024-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathies

Keywords

Type II diabetic mellitus, Diabetic neuropathy, Electromyography

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the differences severity level of diabetic neuropathy based on electromyelography in type II diabetic patient with and without comorbidities. The main questions of this study: 1. What is the electromyography result in type II diabetic patient who: has no comorbidities, with hypertension, with hypertension and dyslipidemia? 2. Is there any differences in electromyography result in type II diabetic patient who: has no comorbidities, with hypertension, with hypertension and dyslipidemia? 3. Is there any association between distal latency with nerve conduction velocity in type II diabetic patient with and without comorbidities? 4. Is there any association between distal latency with amplitude in type II diabetic patient with and without comorbidities? 5. Is there any differences on diabetic neuropathy severity based on age, height, and A1C levels in type II diabetic patient with and without comorbidities? Researchers will collect information based on hospital registry as secondary data of in type II diabetic patient with and without comorbidities. The data consist of demographic data, clinical presentation, laboratory, and electromyography were collected from hospital registry by reviewing medical record. Then, the data was analyzed by using IBM SPSS Statistics v26.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTElectromyography

All of groups will have assessment of electromyography result

Sponsors

Universitas Diponegoro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Diabetic neuropathy patient who classified as distal symmetrical polyneuropathy * Diabetic neuropathy patient who has no comorbidities * Diabetic neuropathy patient who has hypertension * Diabetic neuropathy patient who has hypertension and dyslipidemia

Exclusion criteria

* Diabetic neuropathy patient with history of chemotherapy * Diabetic neuropathy patient with history of hernia nucleus pulposus * Diabetic neuropathy patient with history of CKD stage V or on routine dyalisis * Missing data on medical record

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distal LatencyElectromyography examination was done approximately 1 year after clinical onset of neuropathy appearDistal latency defined as time between stimuli until deflection of Compound Muscle Action Potentials (CMAP) from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nerve Conduction VelocityElectromyography examination was done approximately 1 year after clinical onset of neuropathy appearNerve Conduction Velocity defined as the measurement of axon conduction velocity by dividing space of nerve conduction with time needed
AmplitudeElectromyography examination was done approximately 1 year after clinical onset of neuropathy appearAmplitude define as the height of first negative deflection of Compound Muscle Action Potentials (CMAP) from baseline

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026