Skip to content

Non-invasive Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in ARDS Patient

Non-invasive Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in ARDS Patients - a Feasibility Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06572280
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-08-27
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2025-01-30
Last updated
2024-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ARDS, Human, Diaphragm Injury, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Keywords

ARDS, diaphragm injury, mechanical ventilation

Brief summary

Reduced diaphragmatic activity during mechanical ventilation can lead to diaphragmatic disuse atrophy, atelectasis, increased lung stress and strain, and hemodynamic impairment. This, in turn, may prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation, make weaning more difficult, and even increase mortality. Synchronizing phrenic nerve stimulation to promote diaphragmatic activity may prevent ventilator-induced lung injury and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction, thereby improving patient outcomes. Surgically implanted phrenic nerve stimulation has been used in certain neurological disorders, but the effects of percutaneous non-invasive synchronized phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with ARDS undergoing mechanical ventilation remain unclear and require further investigation.

Detailed description

Mechanical ventilation is an important treatment for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). However, reduced diaphragmatic activity during mechanical ventilation can lead to diaphragmatic disuse atrophy, atelectasis, increased lung stress and strain, and hemodynamic impairment. This, in turn, may prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation, make weaning more difficult, and even increase mortality in these patients. In patients with AHRF undergoing mechanical ventilation, maintaining moderate spontaneous breathing under lung and diaphragm protective ventilation remains challenging. Synchronizing phrenic nerve stimulation to promote diaphragmatic activity may prevent ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD), thereby improving patient outcomes. Surgically implanted phrenic nerve stimulation has been used in certain neurological disorders, but the effects of percutaneous non-invasive synchronized phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing mechanical ventilation remain unclear and require further investigation.

Interventions

DEVICEPNS group

non-invasive phrenic nerve stimulation

Sponsors

Southeast University, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult ARDS patients undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation 2. The duration of endotracheal intubation \< 48 hrs

Exclusion criteria

1. Neurological condition affecting motor neuron or muscle (e.g. ALS) 2. Paralysis of the phrenic nerve 3. Proven or suspected spinal cord injury 4. Conditions that limit diaphragm movement 5. Patients with Implanted cardiac support systems (pacemaker, implanted defibrillator) 6. Patients with implanted medical pumps 7. Pregnancy 8. Patients with skin lesions, infections or strictures in throat/neck area 9. Patients with metallic implants 10. Refusal to sign informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of enough Tidal volumeProcedure (from enrollment to extubation)Percentage of stimulated breaths above the cut-off target tidal volume (3-6 ml/kg ideal body weigh) out of the total number of stimulated breaths
The speed of successful non-invasive electrical stimulation deploymentProcedure (from enrollment to extubation)Time between first successful electrical phrenic stimulation and identification of the optimal stimulation locus in seconds

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diaphragm thickening fractionup to 28 daysDiaphragm thickening fraction measured with ultrasound of the diaphragm.
Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)Procedure (from enrollment to extubation)MIP is measured by the mechanical ventilator during electromagnetic phrenic nerve stimulation.
Diaphragm excursionup to 28 daysDiaphragm excursion measured with ultrasound of the diaphragm.
Respiratory system complianceProcedure (from enrollment to extubation)Respiratory system compliance is calculated as the ratio of tidal volume to the difference between plateau pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure.
ventilation distributionProcedure (from enrollment to extubation)ventilation distribution was measured by EIT
Driving pressureProcedure (from enrollment to extubation)driving pressure was measured in the volume-controlled mode and calculated as the difference between plateau pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactling liu, phD
18826401594@163.com15901599659

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026