Skip to content

Addressing Unintentional Leakage When Using Nasal CPAP - Study B

Mechanisms of Weight Gain During CPAP Treatment in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06570629
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-08-26
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2025-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Adverse Effect, Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

CPAP, Excessive leak, Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Brief summary

Oral unintentional leak is a common side effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. Management of oral unintentional leakage has not been standardized and the effectiveness of potential approaches have not been studied in controlled studies. Higher levels of CPAP are associated with higher leak. In the present study, a sequential approach to control excessive unintentional leak will be tested. In study A, the reduction of therapeutic CPAP level will be tested. In study B, oronasal CPAP will be compared to nasal CPAP with a chinstrap.

Detailed description

Study B will consist of a controlled crossover trial to compare unintentional leak during the use of an oronasal mask versus a nasal mask with a chinstrap, among subjects who remain with excessive leak at the end of study A. The order of interventions will be randomized. One of the groups will initially use an oronasal mask for 10 days. A washout period of 7 days under nasal CPAP will follow. After washout, subjects will continue using a nasal mask and will be asked to use a chinstrap for another 10 days. In the other group, the order of interventions will be the opposite.

Interventions

In this crossover trial, subjects will use CPAP with either an oronasal mask or a. nasal mask with a chinstrap for 7 days. The order of each intervention will be randomized.

DEVICENasal CPAP plus Chinstrap

In this crossover trial, subjects will use CPAP with either an oronasal mask or a. nasal mask with a chinstrap for 7 days. The order of each intervention will be randomized.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea; * Use of CPAP with a nasal mask; * 95th percentile of unintentional leak from the last 7 days above 24 l/min, or at least 4 sudden drops of leak over one night of nasal CPAP * Persistence of excessive leak at the end of Study A.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who experience unintentional leakage from the mask/accessories. * Diagnostic polysomnography examination with a predominance of central apnea; * Patients with unstable heart disease, bedridden, neurodegenerative diseases, severe psychiatric disorders and COPD; * Previous surgery for obstructive sleep apnea; * Severe nasal obstruction (NOSE questionnaire score equal or greater then 55 points).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
95th CPAP unintentional leak27 daysThe 95th unintentional leak percentile value will be compared during both interventions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)27 daysResidual AHI will be compared during both interventions
CPAP Side-effects questionnaire27 daysThis questionnaire addresses CPAP side-effects including those related to excessive air leak using a visual-analog scale.
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ 10)27 daysThe FOSQ 10 aims to assess the impacts of daytime sleepiness on daily activities. The FOSQ 10 consists of 10 questions comprising 5 items: General productivity, alertness, activity level, social outcomes, and intimate and sexual relationships. Each item generates a score from 1 to 4, and for items with more than one question, the average of the scores is calculated. The overall score is given by multiplying the average of the item scores by 5, obtaining a value from 5 to 20. The higher the score, the better the individual's functional status.
Pittsburgh questionnaire27 daysThe Pittsburgh questionnaire assessed sleep quality over the past month. The questionnaire consists of 19 self-reported questions and 5 questions related to the roommate/bed partner that are not included in the overall score. The 19 self-reported questions are divided into 7 components (respectively, subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime sleep dysfunction), and each component is scored on a scale of 0 to 3. The scores are then summed to form an overall scale of 0 to 21 points. The higher the score, the worse the sleep quality, and a PSQI greater than 5 indicates poor sleep quality.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactPedro Genta
prgenta@gmail.com551126625486

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026