Skip to content

Remifentanil Versus Rocuronium for Optimizing Video Laryngoscopy-assisted Tracheal Intubation

Remifentanil Versus Rocuronium for Optimizing Video Laryngoscopy-assisted Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anaesthesia - a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial -The ROCVIDEO Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06564857
Acronym
ROCVIDEO
Enrollment
2648
Registered
2024-08-21
Start date
2025-11-17
Completion date
2027-04-08
Last updated
2025-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Remifentanil, Rocuronium, Tracheal Intubation, Video Laryngoscopy

Brief summary

Globally, we are approaching 1 million surgical procedures each day. Tracheal intubation is the mainstay of securing the patient's airway and breathing during general anaesthesia. Approximately 100.000 tracheal intubations are performed annually in Denmark. Airway management remains the primary reason for anaesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. It has been traditionally accepted that best tracheal intubation conditions are obtained by paralysing the patient's muscles, including vocal cords, using a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) such as rocuronium. However, using NBMA may increase the risk of pulmonary complications, intra-operative awareness, in which the patient is paralysed but awake during surgery, anaphylaxis, and re-intubation. In addition, there is a risk of residual neuromuscular blockade postoperatively. In the US, prolonged ventilation and unplanned intubation are the top two most costly perioperative complications. An alternative to NMBA is a large dose of opioids to depress laryngeal reflexes during intubation. The most commonly used non-NMBA modality includes bolus administration of remifentanil. However, remifentanil may cause bradycardia and hypotension. Even short periods of hypotension have been shown to increase the risk of myocardial injury and other serious adverse events such as renal failure, delirium, and even mortality. Evidence also indicates that intubation conditions using only opioids to facilitate intubation, including remifentanil, are inferior to NMBA. However, these trials are underpowered to assess effects on patient-important outcomes and are mostly at high risk of bias. A recent trial has suggested that remifentanil intubation conditions may not be very different. Almost all existing research comparing NMBA to opioids has focused on intubation conditions for direct laryngoscopy using a conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy blade. In recent years, the implementation and availability of the video laryngoscope have grown exponentially and become universal. The video laryngoscope has vastly improved the ease of tracheal intubation, and the number of failed intubations has decreased by two-thirds in Denmark, where a rapid implementation of the video laryngoscope took place. However, limited evidence exists on whether NMBA improves intubation conditions compared to remifentanil when performing video laryngoscope-assisted tracheal intubation.

Interventions

DRUGRemifentanil

Age \< 70 years: Bolus of 4 μg/kg Ideal Body Weight remifentanil at anaesthesia induction; Age \>= 70 years: Bolus of 2 μg/kg ideal Body Weight remifentanil at anaesthesia induction

DRUGRocuronium

Bolus of 0.6 mg/kg Ideal Body Weight rocuronium at anaesthesia induction

Sponsors

Nordsjaellands Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment, multicenter

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ≥ 18 years * Undergoing general anaesthesia requiring oro-tracheal intubation * Absence of indication for rapid sequence induction * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score I - III

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergies or contraindications to rocuronium (e.g. neuromuscular disease) or remifentanil * Awake intubation * Double-lumen endotracheal tube * Oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal surgery * Surgical contraindication for NMBAs (e.g. use of nerve stimulator) * Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Patients who do not understand Danish or are unable to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants with one or more intubation or anaesthesia related adverse events0 minutes to 24 hours after administration of drugs for intubationEarly (\< 10 min): Cardiac arrest; anaphylaxis; pulmonary aspiration of gastric content; serious traumatic airway injury; desaturation (SAT \< 90%); major hemodynamic instability (MAP \< 50, new onset bradycardia \< 40 beats/min); or sustained new arrhythmia (causing hemodynamic instability or requiring intervention). Late (\< 24 h): Death; brain damage including stroke; acute myocardial infarction; ICU admission; re-intubation; respiratory failure (oxygen demand \> 5 l/min or requiring interventions aside from oxygen therapy); intraoperative awareness; pneumonia; dental injury; sore throat; or hoarseness.
Proportion of participants with failed first-pass intubationTracheal intubation is performed 2 minutes after administration of rocuronium or remifentanil.Defined as failed tracheal tube delivery after the first attempt of introduction of the video laryngoscope into the patient's mouth. Tracheal tube delivery is defined as failed when the tube is retracted out of the patient's mouth, OR the video laryngoscope has to be retracted out of the patient's mouth, OR there is a shift in intubation equipment OR a change in the person performing the intubation management OR the intubation is abandoned.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction score24 hours after administration of drugs for intubationThe patient's experience of the treatment using a numeric rating scale (NRS 0 - 10 (0 = very dissatisfied; 10 = very satisfied))
Proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events 0-7 days0 minutes to 7 days after administration of drugs for intubationDefined as: respiratory failure, major adverse cardiac (in-hospital all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) both acute ST elevation MI and non-ST elevation MI, complete heart block, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrhythmia and cardiac arrest), pneumonia, acute kidney injury, admission to ICU and cerebrovascular event (ischemic stroke including transient cerebral ischemia).
Lengths of stay at the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit.0-48 hours postoperativelyMinutes the patient is at the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants in need of vasoactive or chronotropic substances after induction0 to 10 minutes after administration of drugs for intubationDefined as any vasoactive substance, e.g. epinephrine, noradrenaline, phenylephrine, ephedrine administrated as a response to severe hypotension or bradycardia after induction.
Proportion of participants with failed intubation2 to 20 minutes after administration of drugs for intubationThe intubation is abandoned
Individual components of the composite outcomes Proportion of participants with one or more intubation or anaesthesia related adverse events and Proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events 0-7 days0 minutes to 7 days after administration of drugs for intubationAs stated in the relevant outcome descriptions
Number of intubation attempts2 to 20 minutes after administration of drugs for intubationThe first attempt is defined as an attempt (successful or not) at tracheal tube delivery after the first introduction of the video laryngoscope into the patient's mouth. Additionally attempts are defined as: when the tube has to be re-introduced into the patient's mouth, OR the videolaryngoscopy has to be re-introduced into the patient mouth, OR there is a shift in intubation equipment OR a change in the person performing the intubation management
Vocal cords position at first intubation attempt2 to 20 minutes after administration of drugs for intubationCategorised as closed, intermediate or open
Proportion of participants with need for rescue medication or airway management2 to 20 minutes after administration of drugs for intubationRescue medication is defined as: An additional bolus of neuromuscular blocking agents, or bolus of opioid or propofol or other anesthetics according to the discretion of the attending anaesthesiologist in order to solve insufficient airway management conditions.
Proportion of participants with anaesthesia induction related grave desaturation0 to 10 minutes after administration of drugs for intubationSAT \< 80%

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactAnders K Nørskov, PhD
anders.kehlet.noerskov@regionh.dk48292510
Backup ContactLars H Lundstrøm, PhD
lars.hyldborg.lundstroem.02@regionh.dk48296512

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 1, 2026