Skip to content

European Registry for Transperineal Laser Ablation of Prostate (TPLA) for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

European Registry for Transperineal Laser Ablation of Prostate (TPLA) for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06564415
Enrollment
2500
Registered
2024-08-21
Start date
2024-01-11
Completion date
2034-01-31
Last updated
2024-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Prostatic Diseases

Keywords

TPLA, Transperineal Laser Ablation, LUTS, BPH, Benign Prostatic Obstruction

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess mid- and long-term effectiveness of Transperineal Laser Ablation of Prostate (TPLA) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction measured by need and/or time until surgical retreatment. Data regarding patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), flowmetry parameters and safety about consecutive patients undergoing TPLA will be collected in a dedicated platform. Secondary objectives of the study are: * To assess functional and safety outcomes in patients treated with transperineal laser ablation for LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction; * To identify possible differences in characteristics of patients treated with transperineal laser ablation among the centers and possible relations between treatment application and outcomes, in order to explore the optimal indications and possible limitations of TPLA for LUTS.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransperineal Laser Ablation of Prostate

Transperineal Laser Ablation of the Prostate is an ultra minimally-invasive procedure that consists in the insertion trough the perineum skin of laser fibers into the prostatic adenoma, under US guidance. Laser energy generates an area of coagulative necrosis that will bring to a reduction of the prostatic volume.

Sponsors

University of Florence
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years; * Prostate volume ≥ 30 mL; * Moderate-to-severe LUTS according to International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS ≥8) * Consent to participate;

Exclusion criteria

* Absence of consent; * Subsequent withdrawal of consent; * Diagnosis or suspicion of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance * Documented bladder impaired contractility * Urethral stenosis * Previous prostate surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of partecipants needing for other surgery5 yearsMid- and long-term effectiveness of TPLA measured by need and/or time until surgical retreatment for BPO (e.g. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), endoscopic enucleation, simple prostatectomy)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Treatment-Related Adverse Events according to Comprehensive Complication Index6 monthsNumber of Participants with Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by Comprehensive Complication Index. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) reflects the gravity of the overall complication burden on the patient on a scale from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death)
Change from Baseline in the International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS)5 yearsPatient-reported outcome measure about urinary symptoms evaluated by International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) - values from 0 to 35 (higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Change from Baseline in the IPSS - Quality of Life score5 yearsPatient-reported outcome measure about impact of urinary symptoms on quality of life evaluated by IPSS - Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire (values from 0 to 6 - higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Change from Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5)5 yearsPatient-reported outcome measure about erectile function evaluated by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) - values from 0 to 25 (higher values mean a better outcome)
Number of Participants with Treatment-Related Adverse Events according to Clavien-Dindo Scale6 monthsNumber of Participants with Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by Clavien-Dindo scale (score from I to V - higher scores mean a worse outcome)
Change from Baseline in the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire 3-items (MSHQ 3-items)5 yearsPatient-reported outcome measure about ejaculatory function evaluated by Male Sexual Health Questionnaire 3-items (MSHQ 3-items) - values from 0 to 15 (higher scores mean a better outcome)
Change from Baseline in maximum flow rate (ml/s)5 yearsChange from Baseline in maximum flow rate (ml/s) evaluated at uroflowmetry
Change from Baseline in post void residual volume (ml)5 yearsChange from Baseline in post void residual volume (ml) evaluated with sovrapubic ultrasound or bladderscan after spontaneous micturition
Change from Baseline in the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire bother (MSHQ bother)5 yearsPatient-reported outcome measure about impact of ejaculatory disfunctions in quality of life evaluated by Male Sexual Health Questionnaire bother (MSHQ bother) - values from 0 to 5 (higher scores mean a worse outcome)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactFrancesco Sessa
francesco_sessa@hotmail.it+39 3287305299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026