Skip to content

The Main Content of This Study is to Use Virtual Reality Technology Combined With Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine Injection at Different Times to Reduce the Pain of PICC in School-age Children

Application Effect of VR Combined With Lidocaine Local Infiltration Anesthesia in PICC Placement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06562829
Enrollment
174
Registered
2024-08-20
Start date
2020-05-21
Completion date
2021-05-28
Last updated
2024-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheterization, Peripheral

Keywords

Catheterization pain,Virtual reality technology ,PICC

Brief summary

We try to through the use of virtual reality technology in combination with lidocaine in different injection time to reduce the pain of PICC catheter school-age children. Using the convenience sampling method, the selection in May 2020, 2021 - may need to PICC placement of children as the research object, is divided into three groups A, B, c, group A in ultrasound guided by PICC placement; Group B and group C adopt VR intervention, and 5 min before the beginning of the next surgery using VR equipment. Group B was anesthetized after the needle was placed into the guide wire, and group C was anesthetized before the needle was placed into the guide wire.

Detailed description

This study investigated the effect of VR combined with lidocaine local infiltration anesthesia in peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion, aiming to improve one-needle puncture success rate, reduce pain, reduce fear, improve compliance and catheterization time. From May 2020 to May 2021, children requiring PICC were recruited by convenience sampling and divided into three groups: A, B and C. Group A was implanted with PICC under ultrasound guidance. Group B and group C all used VR intervention and used VR equipment 5 minutes before the operation began. Group B was anesthetized after the puncture needle was sent into the guide wire, and group C was anesthetized before the puncture needle was sent into the guide wire.The success rate of one puncture, pain, fear, compliance and catheterization time were compared among the three groups. A sample size and power analysis were conducted to determine the sample size required.The investigators assumed a medium effect size (f2 = 0.25) of the active VR. Using 2 tails and alpha = .05, a fixed-effect linear regression model would offer power greater than 0.80 with a total sample size of 159 children. To ensure adequate power, the investigators planned to recruit 56 participants for each group. Three groups were all operated by PICC specialist nurses, and the standard operation procedure of PICC catheterization was implemented in accordance with the infusion therapy nursing practice guidelines and implementation rules and the 2016 INS guidelines.

Interventions

Group B (Lidocaine injection after puncture): ①Download games in the VR headset in advance,The games last approximately 10-15 minutes. Games were selected based on children's preferences, and the VR headset was worn in the optimal state 5 minutes before catheterization.②Sterilized skin -maximum sterile barrier-ultrasound-guided puncture insertion of guidewire -local infiltration anesthesia with 2% lidocaine -broad skin, insertion of skin expansion sheath -insertion of catheter.

OTHERdifferent timing of lidocaine injection

Group C (Lidocaine injection before puncture): Steps①was the same as in group B, After disinfecting the skin, local infiltration anesthesia was administered at the prepuncture site under ultrasound guidance using 0.5ml of 2% lidocaine. Approximately 2 minutes later, a skin puncture was performed and a guidewire was inserted. A broad incision was made to accommodate the torn vascular sheath for delivering the catheter to the predetermined length.

Sponsors

Qi Yu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

From May 2020 to May 2021, children requiring PICC were recruited by convenience sampling and divided into three groups: A, B and C. Group A was implanted with PICC under ultrasound guidance. Group B and group C all used VR intervention and used VR equipment 5 minutes before the operation began. Group B was anesthetized afterthe puncture needle was sent into the guide wire, and group C was anesthetized before the puncture needle was sent into the guide wire. The success rate of one puncture, pain, fear, compliance and catheterization time were compared among the three group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged between 6 and 12 years. * Undergoing their inaugural ultrasound-guided PICC insertion in an up. * Voluntarper limby participation and informed consent by parents or guardians.

Exclusion criteria

* Children with severe cardiocerebral conditionsor critical coagulopathies. * Known lidocaine allergies. * Severe mental illness or cognitive impairment in patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate of one punctureImmediately after the end of the catheterizationThe blood vessel was entered by one puncture, and there was no other operation to explore the subcutaneous vessel, pull out the needle or change the puncture site

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain scoreImmediately after the end of the catheterizationAssessed using the Visual Analogue Scale ranging from no pain (0) to the most severe pain (10). A higher score indicates a greater degree of pain.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026