Skip to content

Incisional Negative Pressure Therapy to Prevent Animal Induced Wound Infection

A Study on the Application of Incisional Negative Pressure Therapy in Reducing the Risk of Infection in Animal Induced Injury Patients With Primary Wound Closure

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06558942
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-08-19
Start date
2024-08-20
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injury Caused by Animal Bites, Wound Infection

Keywords

Animal bite injury, Incision negative pressure treatment technology, Wound infection rate

Brief summary

Animal injuries are a significant public health issue, with the most common being bites or scratches from cats and dogs. Every year, over 40 million people in China are bitten or scratched by cats and dogs, which can lead to wound infections and even systemic complications, with infection rates ranging from 10% to 80%. However, there is still no better way to reduce wound infection rates in current clinical studies and guidelines. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is a new wound treatment technology developed in recent years. It creates a negative pressure environment on sutured or closed wounds, helps to fix the edges of the incision together, reduce lateral tension on the wound, stimulate blood perfusion at the edge of the wound, remove fluid from the wound, and act as an external pollution barrier. INPWT has been widely used for postoperative wound healing in surgery, but there is currently a lack of effective clinical trials on its ability to prevent wound infections caused by animal injuries and promote wound healing. This study aims to apply iNPWT technology to the wounds of patients with rabies grade III exposure who underwent primary suturing, and compare it with wounds covered with ordinary gauze after previous primary suturing to determine whether it can help reduce postoperative incision infection rates and promote wound healing. This will provide high-quality clinical evidence for the widespread use of wound management in rabies grade III exposure patients in the future.

Interventions

DEVICEincisional negative pressure wound technology

Negative pressure device used directly on closed or sutured incisions

Sponsors

Peking University First Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Limds injuries caused by animals, first or second animal injury to Grade III exposed patients, with deep wounds reaching the fat layer, tendons, and even penetrating injuries. * Patients with wounds\>2cm and severe injuries that even require surgical treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Missing or incomplete follow-up data within 30 days. * Patients who have been infected with wounds or have been injured for more than 8 hours before seeking medical attention. * Acupuncture like wound (\<2mm). * Patients with whole skin detachment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound infection (WI)<4 weeksThe local skin of the wound appears red, swollen, hot, and painful, with or without systemic hyperthermia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delayed healing of wounds (DHW)2-4 weeksWound healing time is longer than 14 days.
Wound reprocessing (WR)≤4 weeksIncluding wound dehiscence, hematoma, seroma and other situation needed to switch treatments.
other wound complication≤4 weeksredness and rash of skin around the wound.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShi Jiping, Master
earthsjp@126.com18801238951
Backup ContactLiu Si, doctor
DocLeo@PKU.edu.cn15701064937

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026