Skip to content

Uterocervical Angle Versus Cervical Length as a Predictor of Labor Induction in Term Singleton Pregnancy

Uterocervical and Posterior Cervical Angle Versus Cervical Length and Bishop's Score as a Predictor of Labor Induction in Term Singleton Pregnancy: a Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06558500
Enrollment
140
Registered
2024-08-16
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
2024-08-02
Last updated
2024-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor (Obstetrics)--Complications

Keywords

Nulliparous, labor induction, posterior cervical angle, uterocervical angle, cervical length

Brief summary

Induction of labor is frequently performed in all obstetric clinics. Failed IOL has been defined in many different ways.Bishop scoring, which is a traditional and subjective method, is more frequently evaluated with cervical length, which has taken its place in preterm labor, and various ultrasonographic evaluations such as Uterocervical angle (UCA), Posterior cervical angle (PCA), cervical elastography, transvulvar ultrasonography, which have recently increased in popularity, have gained importance and led us to evaluate these parameters in our clinic. The relationship between the angles between the uterus and cervix and labor has been known for some time.

Detailed description

Induction of labor is frequently performed in all obstetric clinics for various indications, with a worldwide spectrum ranging from 1.4 to 35%. Failed IOL has been defined in many different ways. It has been defined as a dilatation of less than 4 cm despite administration of oxytocin for 12 hours±3 hours (target 200-225 MVU or 3 contractions/10 min), induction of labor with oxytocin for at least 12-18 hours (after rupture of membranes) and a latent phase lasting 24 hours or longer, primarily considering fetal and maternal well-being. In some sources, it is defined as failure to achieve regular (e.g. every 3 minutes) uterine contractions and cervical changes with artificial rupture of membranes after at least 6-8 hours of oxytocin maintenance dose. For this reason, various subjective & ultrasonographic parameters used to predict induction success are of great importance for the evaluation of the cervix. Bishop scoring, which is a traditional and subjective method, is more frequently evaluated with cervical length, which has taken its place in preterm labor, and various ultrasonographic evaluations such as Uterocervical angle (UCA), Posterior cervical angle (PCA), cervical elastography, transvulvar ultrasonography, which have recently increased in popularity, have gained importance and led us to evaluate these parameters in our clinic. The relationship between the angles between the uterus and cervix and labor has been known for some time.

Interventions

With the patient in the lithotomy position and empty bladder, care was taken to avoid applying pressure to the cervix with the transvaginal probe. The cervix was aligned in the midline, and the endocervical canal was visualized throughout its length.During cervical measurement, care was taken to ensure that the internal os, external os, and entire endocervical canal were visible in the same image. With the endocervical canal, external os, and internal os linearly displayed on the screen, the angle between the endocervical canal, anterior and posterior uterine segment was measured using the ultrasound's angle measurement feature.For the measurement of the uterocervical angle, the first line of the angle was defined along the endocervical canal used for measuring cervical length, and the second line was drawn from the internal os along the anterior uterine segment for a minimum of two centimeters. The angle between these two lines was recorded as the uterocervical angle in the form.

Sponsors

Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Health Care, Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

37 weeks and older Nulliparity Live, singular Verteks presentation Cervical opening\<3 cm Bishop score\<7 Patients not in active action

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of contraindications to vaginal delivery (pls previa, detached pls...) * History of previous uterine surgery * Multiple pregnancies * Non-vertex presentation * Uncontrolled HT Uncontrolled DM * Fetal distress * Macrosomic fetus Patients in active labor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The efficacy of uterocervical angle2 daysThe efficacy of uterocervical angle in predicting labor induction success in nulliparous patients at term.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026