Frailty, Old Age
Conditions
Keywords
Exercise, Rural areas
Brief summary
Global aging is a significant challenge, both economically and in terms of public health. One of the main challenges is to maintain the health and functionality of older adults. Physical exercise has been suggested as one of the best non-pharmacological tools to prevent health and functionality loss. However, existing scientific literature has mainly focused on older adults from urban centers. There are no studies focused on older people in rural areas, who have particular characteristics. The present project aims to evaluate the effects of a face-to-face and video-assisted intervention, which incorporates multi-component physical exercise with different motivational strategies, on the mental health, physical function, and frailty of individuals over 65 years of age residing in rural areas. Additionally, it aims to determine the effectiveness, safety, and adherence of new technologies in carrying out an intervention that includes multi-component physical exercise, cognitive work, and motivational strategies through video assistance for older women and men living in rural areas. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted, involving 240 people over the age of 65 who will be randomly divided into two groups. One group, the intervention group, will participate in a face-to-face multicomponent physical exercise program three times a week for 60 minutes per session over 12 weeks. After that, the intervention will continue through video-assisted sessions for the remaining nine months, divided into three blocks of two months of rest and one video-assisted intervention. The control group will continue with their usual daily activities but receive recommendations for physical activity and mental and physical health talks. Both groups will undergo a battery of tests to evaluate the effects of the interventions. The primary variable measured will be functional capacity, assessed through the Short Physical Performance Battery. Secondary variables will include health-related physical condition (Power frail app), cognitive function (Trail making test), and quality of life, among others. The results expected from this study will be of significant scientific and technical importance in the field of psycho-socio-health. Consequently, the project is of utmost importance, not only to enhance the health of the rural population but also to promote individual and social sustainability.
Interventions
DEVICEFace-to-face and video-assisted training
During the first phase, the intervention group will receive face-to-face training over 12 weeks. Each session will last 60 minutes, and there will be five sessions per week, with three supervised and two unsupervised. In the second phase, there will be 60 work sessions, divided into blocks of four weeks on three occasions, with one month of exercise and two months of non-exercise over the remaining 9 months. This phase will be conducted via video assistance. Each session will include a warm-up of 10-15 minutes, a main part of 20-40 minutes, and a cool-down of 10-15 minutes.
Sponsors
Universidad de Zaragoza
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The statistician will only have codes but in the database but will not know which code corresponds to which group
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age equal to or greater than 65 years. * Be able to provide informed consent voluntarily. * Walk autonomously. * Have a score of 4 points or more on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).
Exclusion criteria
Those that have to do with contraindications for performing physical exercise: * Recent acute myocardial infarction within the last 3-6 months or unstable angina. * Uncontrolled atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. * Dissecting aortic aneurysm. * Severe aortic stenosis. * Acute endocarditis or pericarditis. * Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (\>180/100 mmHg). * Acute thromboembolic disease. * Acute and severe heart or respiratory failure. * Recent bone fracture, orthostatic hypotension. * Diabetes or uncontrolled hypoglycemia. * Any pathology that causes a significant functional limitation such as advanced Parkinson's, considerable vision or hearing problems Cancer, or autoimmune disease. * People scoring less than 4 on the SPPB (dependents). * Any pathology or circumstance that the primary care team considers counterproductive to participation in physical exercise.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frailty status. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, T2 = 6 months, T3 = 9 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Frailty status measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 12 points. A score of \< 10 points means frailty. Therefore, a higher score means a better outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frailty. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, T2 = 6 months, T3 = 9 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Frailty status measured with the Frailty Trait Scale (FTS). The minimum value for the 5-item FTS is 0 and the maximum value is 50 points. Frail participants are those with FTS5 scores \> 25 points. Therefore, a higher score means a worse outcome. |
| Power Frail App. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, T2 = 6 months, T3 = 9 months, and T4 = 12 months. | App designed to assess muscle power and frailty in older adults. |
| Cognitive impairment. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, T2 = 6 months, T3 = 9 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Cognitive impairment measured with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 30 points. Any score of 24 or more indicates a normal cognition. Therefore, higher scores indicate a worse outcome. |
| Mental health and depression. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months | Mental health and depression measured with the Geriatric Depression Scale. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 15 points. A score of \> 5 suggests depression. Therefore, higher scores mean a worse outcome. |
| Quality of life of participants EuroQol-5D. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months | Quality of life measured with the EuroQol-5D. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 1. A higher score means a better outcome. |
| Trail Making Test (TMT). | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, T2 = 6 months, T3 = 9 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Speed for attention, sequencing, mental flexibility visual search and motor function measured with the TMT parts A \& B. There is no maximum value or minimum value. In the part A, a score of \> 78 seconds suggests deficiency. In the part B is \> 273 seconds. Results for both are reported as the number of seconds required to complete the task; therefore, higher scores reveal greater impairment. |
| DeJong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Emotional and social loneliness measured with the DeJong Gierveld Loneliness Scale. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 6 points. This gives a possible range of scores from 0 to 6, which can be read as follows: 0 = (Least lonely) and 6 = (Most lonely). Therefore, higher scores mean a worse outcome. |
| The Aging Self-Efficacy Scale. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months. | The perceived level of control that elderly individuals have over the aspects, content, and outcomes of aging measured with the Aging Self-Efficacy Scale. The minimum value is 10 and the maximum value is 40 points. A higher score means a better outcome. |
| Muscular strength of the upper limbs. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Measured with a handgrip dynamometer. |
| Muscular strength of the lower limbs. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Measured with the stand and sit chair test. |
| Aerobic capacity. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Six minute walk test. |
| Walking speed. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, T2 = 6 months, T3 = 9 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Walking speed measured over 3, 4, and 6 meters. |
| SARC-F Questionnaire. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months | Sarcopenia measured with the SARC-F questionnaire. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 10 points. A score of 4 points or more indicates a high risk of sarcopenia. Therefore, higher scores mean a worse outcome. |
| Body composition - Fat mass and Fat-Free mass. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Body fat measured with bioelectrical impedance analysis. |
| Objective physical activity levels (minutes and intensities) | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months | Physical activity levels registered with triaxial accelerometers that they will wear during 7 days. |
| Walking steps. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Number of walking steps measured with Global Positioning System. |
| Walking distance. | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, and T4 = 12 months | Total walking distance, in meters, measured with Global Positioning System. |
| Physical activity levels | T0 = pre-intervention, T1 = 3 months, T2 = 6 months, T3 = 9 months, and T4 = 12 months. | Physical activity levels measures with Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). It uses frequency, duration, and intensity level of activity over the previous week to assign a score, ranging from 0 to 793, with higher scores indicating greater physical activity. |
Countries
Spain
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAngel Matute-Llorente, PhD
University of Zaragoza - EXERGENUD Research Group
Outcome results
None listed