Hernia, Inguinal, Laparoscopic Surgery
Conditions
Keywords
hernia surgery, inguinal hernia, fixation free repair, TAPP, laparoscopic surgery
Brief summary
there are currently two methods for fixation free laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair specifically based on the intrinsic properties of the device used. The Progrip mesh technique leaves the hernia orifice patent and relies on the established principle of strengthening the groin through scar tissue incorporation induced by foreign body reaction. In contrast, the ProFlor concept introduces a 3D dynamic regenerative scaffold that permanently obliterates the defect and regenerates the herniated inguinal barrier. This report presents the outcomes of laparoscopic techniques employing Progrip and ProFlor in randomized clinical trial. The results of this clinical study may have the potential to pave the way for innovative advancements in hernia repair techniques.
Interventions
PROCEDUREProflor group
evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients underwent to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Proflor mesh.
PROCEDUREProgrip group
evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients underwent to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with Progrip mesh.
Sponsors
University of Palermo
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Masking description
Compared progrip mesh with proflor mesh
Intervention model description
we use progrip mesh and proflor mesh in different arms of patients
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* bilateral inguinal hernia
Exclusion criteria
* Recurrent inguinal hernia * Incarcerated inguinal hernia * Hernia not in the inguinal area * Signs of obvious local or systemic infection * ASA score \> 4 * Presenting with unstable angina or NYHA class of IV * Pregnant * Active drug user * Immunosuppression, chemotherapy * Chronic renal insufficiency * Abdominal ascites * Infection in area of the surgical field * BMI \>34
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative adverse events | 30-postoperative days | postoperative adverse events. The primary objective of these evaluations was to detect any possible complications that may have arisen, including but not limited to recurrence, hematoma, seroma, testicular swelling, wound infection/abscesses, prosthesis displacement, or any other complication. We used clinical observation and radiological findings to detect these complications. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analogue score (VAS) | 1 - 6- 12 and 24 months | The secondary endpoints included evaluations of postoperative pain. During follow-up control, patients were tasked with completing questionnaires aimed at evaluating their clinical conditions. To assess pain levels during the early stage (until four weeks postop.), the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was employed. The VAS score is a widely recognized tool that enables patients to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 signifies no pain and 10 indicates the most severe pain imaginable. |
| Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) | 1 - 6- 12 and 24 months | The secondary endpoints included evaluations of discomfort and quality of life. During follow-up control, patients were tasked with completing questionnaires aimed at evaluating their clinical conditions. For long-term clinical evaluation starting from four weeks postop, patients were instructed to fill out the Carolinas Comfort Scale questionnaire (CCS), regarded as the optimal scoring system for discomfort, and other postoperative symptoms. The CCS questionnaire offered a more thorough insight into the patient's experience and facilitated the evaluation of their long-term outcomes. The CCS is a 23-itemquestionnaire that quantifies the severity of pain, mesh sensation, and movement limitation from the hernia or surgical site during the following 8 activities: lying down, bending over, sitting up, activities of daily living, coughing or deep breathing (Min. 0 with no discomfort in all activity; Max. 115 with maximum discomfort in all activity) |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed