Obesity
Conditions
Brief summary
Patients with obesity who are candidates for bariatric surgery may exhibit high rates of psychological symptoms, mostly anxiety and depression, and even full-blown mental disorders. The etiopathogenesis of this association has been variously investigated, and among the various factors, the presence of systemic inflammation, even if low-grade, seems to be an underlying mechanism for both conditions. These associations have been shown to have a significant impact from both a clinical perspective and regarding the outcomes of the surgery itself . Worse outcomes have been described in individuals with anxiety-depressive syndromes or mood disorders. However, additional impacts on treatment can also result from the presence of dysfunctional personality traits and early traumatic experiences (reported in about 50% of individuals with severe/pathological obesity), which, in turn, correlate with pathological eating behaviors in a high percentage of cases. Studies conducted in various countries show that about 40% of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery have at least one psychiatric diagnosis, with depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders being the three most common diagnoses Most studies on bariatric patients have focused on factors predisposing to severe obesity or predictive of surgical outcomes and post-surgery progress, but often lack a more precise psychological and psychopathological characterization of this patient population. Targeted studies with a longitudinal design that include long-term post-surgery follow-up are necessary to clarify the actual role of these factors as well as their interaction with other pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the clinical presentation and response to various treatment strategies. Identifying new therapeutic targets during the preoperative evaluation process could, in fact, contribute to improving clinical and post-surgical outcomes. Despite bariatric surgery demonstrating a positive short-term impact on weight-related comorbidities and functioning levels, particularly in social relationships, the emergence of unique and peculiar psychosocial problems and/or concerns in the postoperative follow-up has been reported. In a 10-year longitudinal study, a significant increase in mental health service access was observed following bariatric surgery, especially among those with a positive psychiatric history before the surgery. Besides weight loss, surgical outcomes should include improvements in metabolic status and medical comorbidities, increased quality of life, and better psychosocial and behavioral functioning. Even in a patient with excellent postoperative weight loss, psychosocial problems such as disruptions in interpersonal relationships, body image dissatisfaction, substance use, or suicidal ideation may arise. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the sociodemographic, clinical, personality, psychological, and psychopathological characteristics of patients with severe/pathological obesity requesting bariatric surgery through a baseline assessment and, if applicable, at six and twelve months post-surgery.
Interventions
PROCEDUREBariatric Surgery
The patient performs: * psychological clinical interview * psychodiagnostic examination * internal medical examination * blood tests * electrocardiogram * bariatric surgery * surgical visit
Sponsors
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* All sex; * Age ≥18 years * Diagnosis of grade II or grade III (or pathological) obesity based on body mass index values, respectively, of 35-40 and \>40 kg/m² * Multidisciplinary evaluation aimed at indicating bariatric surgery interventions as per clinical practice * Provision of written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
* Age \<18 years * Diagnosis of neurological disorders associated with cognitive decline (such as to impair the execution of psychometric assessment) * Confirmed pregnancy, breastfeeding, or potential pregnancy with positive serological β- HCG * Refusal to sign the informed consent to participate in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of anxiety and depressive symptoms with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire (GAD-7), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Y). | 1 year | Evaluation of changes in anxiety and depressive symptoms from baseline to one year after bariatric surgery with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire (GAD-7), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Y). GAD - 7: 0 - 4: minimal 5 - 9: mild 10 - 14: moderate 15 - 21: severe PHQ - 9: 0 - 4: minimal 5 - 9: mild 10 - 14: moderate 15 - 19: moderately severe 20 - 27: severe BDI-II: \< 7: none 8 - 17: mild 18 - 24: moderate \>25: severe STAI-Y1/Y2: 20 - 37: none or minimal 38 - 44: moderate 45 - 80: severe |
| Interim evaluation of anxious and depressive symptoms with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire (GAD-7), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Y). | 6 months | Interim evaluation of anxiety and depressive symptoms at six months after bariatric surgery with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire (GAD-7), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Y). GAD - 7: 0 - 4: minimal 5 - 9: mild 10 - 14: moderate 15 - 21: severe PHQ - 9: 0 - 4: minimal 5 - 9: mild 10 - 14: moderate 15 - 19: moderately severe 20 - 27: severe BDI-II: \< 7: none 8 - 17: mild 18 - 24: moderate \>25: severe STAI-Y1/Y2: 20 - 37: none or minimal 38 - 44: moderate 45 - 80: severe |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the variation in global functioning levels from baseline to six months after bariatric. | 6 months | Evaluation of the variation in global functioning levels from baseline at six months after bariatric surgery with Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS 11), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF). DERS: Higher scores suggest greater problems with emotion regulation BIS-11: 30-49: low 50-69: mild 70-89: severe 90-120: extremely severe CD-RISC: A higher score indicates a higher level of resilience CTQ-SF: This questionnaire measures five types of abuse. For each type of childhood trauma, the higher the score is, the greater the severity of abuse for that scale. |
| Evaluation of the variation in global functioning levels at one year after bariatric surgery. | one year | Evaluation of the variation in global functioning levels from baseline at one year after bariatric surgery with Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS 11), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF). DERS: Higher scores suggest greater problems with emotion regulation BIS-11: 30-49: low 50-69: mild 70-89: severe 90-120: extremely severe CD-RISC: A higher score indicates a higher level of resilience CTQ-SF: This questionnaire measures five types of abuse. For each type of childhood trauma, the higher the score is, the greater the severity of abuse for that scale. |
| Evaluation of changes in psychological and psychopathological state dimensions from baseline to one year after bariatric surgery. | 1 year | Evaluation of changes in other psychological and psychopathological state dimensions from baseline to one year after bariatric surgery with Short Form Health Survey - 36 (SF-36), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6), Binge Eating Scale (BES), Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire (CIA 3.0), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). SF-36: The score ranges from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health). PSS: 0-13: low stress 14-26: moderate stress 27-60: high perceived stress EDE-Q 6: \> 2,8: clinically significant BES: \<17: improbable 17-27: possible \>27: possible CIA 3.0: The resulting scores range from 0 to 48, where a higher score indicates a higher level of secondary psychosocial impairment. CORE-OM: \<0,6: healthy 0,6-1: low 1-1,5: mild 1,5-2: moderate 2-2,5: moderately severe \>2,5: severe |
| Evaluation of the variation of the quality from baseline to one year after bariatric surgery with Short Form Health Survey - 36 (SF-36). | 1 year | Evaluation of the variation of the quality from baseline to one year after bariatric surgery with Short Form Health Survey - 36 (SF-36). SF-36: The score ranges from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health). |
| Identification of correlation between psychological and psychopathological trait dimensions and metabolic and inflammatory correlates. | 1 year | Identification of correlation between psychological and psychopathological trait dimensions and metabolic and inflammatory correlates that predict response to bariatric surgery interventions. It will be measured the variation of the metabolic and inflammatory correlates from baseline to one year after bariatric surgery. It will be considered: complete blood count with leukocyte count; C-reactive Protein (PCR); Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (VES); fibrinogen; magnesium; calcium; phosphorus; parathyroid hormone (PTH); vitamin D; uric acid; carbohydrate and lipid profile (glucose, total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides); |
| Evaluation of the variation of the quality of life at six months after bariatric surgery with Short Form Health Survey - 36 (SF-36). | six months | Evaluation of the variation of the quality of life at six months after bariatric surgery with Short Form Health Survey - 36 (SF-36). SF-36: The score ranges from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health). |
| Interim evaluations of changes in other psychological and psychopathological state dimensions at six months after bariatric surgery. | 6 months | Interim evaluations after six months of changes in other psychological and psychopathological state dimensions as per clinical practice. It will be used Short Form Health Survey - 36 (SF-36), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6), Binge Eating Scale (BES), Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire (CIA 3.0), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). SF-36: The score ranges from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health). PSS: 0-13: low stress 14-26: moderate stress 27-60: high perceived stress EDE-Q 6: \> 2,8: clinically significant BES: \<17: improbable 17-27: possible \>27: possible CIA 3.0: The resulting scores range from 0 to 48, where a higher score indicates a higher level of secondary psychosocial impairment. CORE-OM: \<0,6: healthy 0,6-1: low 1-1,5: mild 1,5-2: moderate 2-2,5: moderately severe \>2,5: severe |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactMarco Raffaelli
Outcome results
None listed