Evaluation of the MORENO Score for the Regulation

Evaluation of the MORENO Score for the Regulation of Secondary Transfers to the UAS-SMUR in Brest in Finistère in 2020

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06555874

Acronym

ESMORTSAB19

Enrollment

1500

Registered

2024-08-15

Start date

2020-06-01

Completion date

2021-06-30

Last updated

2024-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

the Safety / Feasibility /MORENO Score/Regulation / Secondary Transfers / SAMU 29 / Current Practices

Brief summary

The main objective of this work is therefore to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the MORENO score for the regulation of secondary transfers to the SAMU 29 compared to current practices.

Detailed description

Today, there is an increase in the number of secondary transfers and paramedical transport between the different hospitals in a territory. They have been promoted by the SFMU (French Society of Emergency Medicine) since 2012. The sharp increase in the number of calls for SAMU regulation means that decisions must be made quickly and safely regarding transport requiring or not requiring a medical presence. The development of a decision support tool for the level of medicalisation of a transfer therefore seems necessary. However, there is currently no recommendation in France. The MORENO score has already been used in a hospital in the Var, as well as in Spain and Greece. Prior validation of this score in our health territory is essential before setting up an operational procedure. Using a list of simple clinical items, this score enables us to assess whether or not it is necessary to medicalise a transfer.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

OTHER

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 120 Years

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients having benefited from a transfer regulated by the SAMU 29 of adult patients on the Finistère territory over a predefined period of time

Exclusion criteria

* Pediatric patient transfers * Maritime transfers * Transfers for which the collected information does not allow to establish the MORENO score. * Patients under judicial protection (guardianship, curatorship,..) * Opposition

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Evaluation of the concordance of the MORENO score for the regulation of secondary transfers at SAMU 29 and our current practices	1 year	Rate of agreement between our practices and the MORENO score strategy.

Countries

France

Outcome results