Skip to content

Mandibular Splint vs Botox Injection in Lateral Pterygoid on Cervical Muscle Activity in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders

Mandibular Splint Versus Botox Injection in Lateral Pterygoid on Cervical Muscle Activity in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06553950
Enrollment
33
Registered
2024-08-14
Start date
2024-08-14
Completion date
2025-02-01
Last updated
2024-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Splint, Botox, Lateral Pterygoid, Cervical Muscle Activity, Temporomandibular Disorders

Brief summary

The study aims to compere mandibular splint versus botox injection in lateral pterygoid on cervical muscle activity in patients with temporomandibular disorders

Detailed description

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions among orofacial pain, consisting of a group of conditions associated with pain and dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory muscles. Temporomandibular joint displacement, also known as internal disc derangement, is an abnormal relationship between the articular disc, the mandibular condyle, and the mandibular fossa. The most frequent displacement of the disc is anterior to the mandibular condyle however, in rare cases it can be posteriorly. Occlusal splint treatment is generally considered to be a basic treatment for Temporomandibular disorders. It could promote correction of the vertical dimension, maxillo-mandibular realignment, temporomandibular joint repositioning and cognitive awareness. Although various splints are currently available, the most used are stabilization splints and anterior repositioning splints. Injection of BTX-A in LP muscle, considering the different methods, frequencies and injection dosages used in different studies, would decrease the clicks and other TMJ-related disorders such as pain, hyperactivity, and dysfunction. Based on the present review, most studies about the injection of botulinum toxin in LP muscle reported cases or were done as quasi-experimental studies.

Interventions

Patients will be treated by Botox injection in lateral pterygoid muscle and medications like muscle relaxants, antidepressants and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A Botox-A vial was diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 10 U per 0.1 mL for injection in a 1-ml insulin syringe. This will be injected into the ipsilateral lateral pterygoid muscle.

DRUGMandibular stabilization splint

Patients will be treated by mandibular stabilization splint and medications like muscle relaxants, antidepressants and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Patients will be treated by medications like muscle relaxants, antidepressants and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age from 18-40 years old. * Both sexes. * Duration of the disease is more than 3 months. * Anterior mandibular disc displacement with reduction will be included. * Unilateral anterior mandibular displacement with reduction grade 2&3 (Wilkes) will be included. * Patients with cervical muscles spasm and trigger points (upper trapezius& sternocleidomastoid) will be included. * Patients with sufficient cognitive abilities that enables them to understand and follow instructions.

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological or musculoskeletal diseases that affect cervical spine other than mandibular disc displacement (eg: cervical spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and cervical disc injuries) * Bilateral anterior mandibular disc displacement patients. * Musculoskeletal disorders such as severe arthritis, cervical spine surgery or contractures of fixed deformity, leg length discrepancy. * women during pregnancy and lactation. * Patients with known hypersensitivity to any component of the drug (especially hypersensitivity to human albumin). * Patients with infection or inflammation of the area where the toxin injections are planned, in patients with musculoskeletal conduction disorders, in primary muscular disorders (muscular dystrophy, neuromyopathy, congenital myopathies, myotonic disorders, mitochondrial myopathy and unspecified or other primary muscle disorders). * Patients being treated with aminoglycoside antibiotics, ciclosporin, D-penicillamine, tubocurarine, pancuronium, gallamine, succinylcholine, chloroquine, or hydroxychloroquine. * History of cervical spine surgery. * History of trauma or fractures in cervical spine. * Signs of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. * Vascular syndrome such as vertebrobasilar insufficiency. * Signs of serious pathology ( e.g., malignancy, inflammatory disorders, infection).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle activity of upper trapizieus and sternocleidomastoidAfter injection for 3 months.Muscle activity of upper trapizieus and sternocleidomastoid will be recorded before and after injection for 3 months by neurosoft Electromyography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amplitude of muscle activityAfter injection for 3 months.Amplitude of muscle activity will be recorded before and after injection for 3 months by neurosoft Electromyography.
Root mean square of muscle activityAfter injection for 3 months.Root mean square of muscle activity will be recorded before and after injection for 3 months by neurosoft Electromyography.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactKerolos G Abd-El Malak, MBBCH
Kerols.ghobreal@deraya.edu.eg00201276145151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026