Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Conditions
Brief summary
The present study will be conducted to assess whether there is a direct benefit associated with modified-Graham's omentopexy (MGO), above and beyond the benefit associated with Graham's omentopexy (GO) in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. We attempted to answer the question whether primary closure of the perforation in MGO will affect the outcome of surgery. Complication rates will be compared for the two alternative surgical procedures.
Interventions
PROCEDURESUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER
Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired using full thickness suture closure using 3/0 vicryl suture then omental patch laied over the sutures.
PROCEDUREOMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER
Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired by using omental patch without any attempt for primary closure of perforation.
Sponsors
Sohag University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
\- All adult patients of both sexes with a clinical diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer (gastric or duodenal) that are fit to undergo surgery.
Exclusion criteria
\- 1. Patients with associated bleeding ulcer (additional steps are needed to control bleeding). 2\. Patients with associated pathology other than perforated peptic ulcer that needs surgical intervention.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Early postoperative follow up for repair of perforated peptic ulcer | Three days after the operation | resumption of oral intake |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactAdel A Abdrabou, Resident
Backup ContactAsem Elsani M Ali, Professor
Outcome results
None listed