Skip to content

Hysteroscopic Guided Versus Ultrasound Guided Extraction of Retained IUD

Hysteroscopic Guided Versus Ultrasound Guided Extraction of Retained IUD A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06550544
Enrollment
130
Registered
2024-08-13
Start date
2024-08-21
Completion date
2025-02-21
Last updated
2024-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraceptive Device; Complications

Keywords

IUD, Office hysteroscopy, Ultrasound, Pain

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the pain experienced during extraction of retained IUD by office hysteroscopy with the pain experienced during extraction of retained IUD under ultrasound guidance . Moreover, the success of both procedures was compared. Various subgroups (patients who delivered only by Caesarean section, patients who delivered virginally, nulliparous women and menopausal patients) in both groups are compared.

Detailed description

The intrauterine device (IUD) is a commonly used long-acting, effective and reversible method of contraception. The recommended way to remove a IUD is by grasping the threads with forceps and applying gentle traction until the IUD is extracted from the external os. Absent of the threads at the time of IUD removal is reported in 4.5 to 18% of cases. If the IUD is present in the uterus and threads are not visible , its removal in the office setting can still be achieved in about 80% of patients with the use of alligator forceps or string retrieval devices, hooks or clamps. However, blind manipulation may cause uterine perforation . In cases where such devices have failed (retained IUD ), If in office extraction of IUD by these instruments failed, removal of this retained IUD in the operating room is often employed because cervical dilatation and regional or general anesthesia are needed. In the last decade, several studies reported in office extraction of retained IUD by office hysteroscopy or under ultrasound guidance. No studies compared the efficacy or safety of these procedures

Interventions

A rigid 2.9 mm hysteroscope with 30° forward oblique lens and outer sheath diameter of 5 mm will be used in the procedure. Vaginoscopic approach will be used. A 5 F grasper will be used to grasp and extract the IUD. Pain intensity will be assessed by visual analogue scale immediately after the procedure.

PROCEDUREUltrasound guided

An alligator forceps will be introduced into the uterine cavity under ultrasound sound guidance. The IUD will be grasped and extracted outside the uterus. Pain intensity will be assessed by visual analogue scale immediately after the procedure.

Sponsors

Bedaya Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with retained IUD

Exclusion criteria

* Active pelvic infection * Viable intrauterine pregnancy * Cervical pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensity of painImmediately after the procedureMeasured after the procedure using a 10 cm Visual analogue scale ( where 0 indicates no pain') and 10 indicates a 'pain as bad as it could possibly be')

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of IUD extractionImmediately after the procedurePercentage of successfully extracted IUD (number of extracted IUDs / total number of retained IUDs)

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactUsama M Fouda, Prof.
umfrfouda@kasralainy.edu.eg01095401375

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026