Skip to content

Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality (AR/VR) for Ultrasound-guided Medical Procedures

The Use of Augmented Reality (AR) or Virtual Reality (VR) to Enhance the Precision and Accuracy of Ultrasound-guided Medical Procedures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06550193
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-08-12
Start date
2025-09-30
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality

Keywords

ultrasound-guided procedure, nerve block

Brief summary

The study seeks to assess the efficacy of incorporating augmented reality (AR) or virtual reality (VR) technology into ultrasound-guided medical procedures such as regional anesthesia and line placement. By utilizing AR/VR devices, the investigators will improve the ergonomics when using ultrasound to guide procedures. The aims are to enhance visualization of anatomical structures and improve procedural accuracy for clinicians. The study aims to evaluate the feasibility, and effectiveness of integrating AR/VR technology into ultrasound-guided procedures, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes.

Detailed description

The investigators aim to learn several key insights from this study. Firstly, they hope to determine the extent to which augmented reality (AR) or virtual reality (VR) technology can enhance the precision and accuracy of ultrasound-guided medical procedures, such as regional anesthesia and line placement. This includes evaluating whether AR/VR visualization leads to improved needle placement and reduced complication rates. Furthermore, the investigators aim to evaluate the usability and acceptance of AR/VR technology among clinicians, considering factors such as user experience, comfort, and integration with existing workflow processes. The importance of this new knowledge lies in its potential to improve medical practice by leveraging cutting-edge technology to improve patient outcomes and expand access to quality healthcare globally. If AR/VR proves to be effective in enhancing procedural accuracy, it could lead to significant advancements in healthcare delivery, particularly in underserved communities and resource-limited settings by leveraging remote care. Additionally, insights gained from this study could inform the development of future AI assisted AR/VR applications in medicine, driving innovation and improving the standard of care across various medical specialties.

Interventions

DEVICEUltrasound-guided procedure using AR/VR technology

Participants will receive the intervention, which involves utilizing AR/VR technology during ultrasound-guided procedures (e.g., regional anesthesia, line placement). All participants will receive standard pre- and post-block or line care as they normally would for the ultrasound-guided procedure.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants will receive the intervention, which involves utilizing AR/VR technology during ultrasound-guided procedures.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients presenting for ultrasound-guided procedures, with ASA physical status I, II, or III.

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * incarceration * BMI \>35

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure success rate (Primary Block)Document the block result pre-operatively (at least 30 min following block completion), or within one hour upon arriving to PACUDocument the block result in pre-op, if feasible, or PACU by testing sensory (cold spray) and motor function on all nerves covered by the block
Post-operative opioid consumption12 hours after surgeryMorphine milligram equivalents (MME) will be measured post-operatively
Post-operative pain scores12 hours after surgeryTrend pain scores on 11-point NRS scale (from 0 to 10) following the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinician satisfactionWithin 24 hours of block completionA short survey will be utilized to gather data on clinicians' perceptions of the ease of use, effectiveness, and overall experience with AR/VR tools compared to traditional methods.
Procedure durationDuring the procedureTime of procedure from initial needle insertion to needle removal will be calculated
Needle pass/redirectionDuring the procedureThe number of times a clinician must remove the needle from the patient completely and reattempt will be calculated.
Needle visualisationWithin 24 hours of block completionA subjective score will be assessed on a short survey to clinicians.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJean-Louis Horn, MD
hornj@stanford.edu5033811645
CONTACTKsenia (kasimova), MD
kasimova@stanford.edu6507889458

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 8, 2026