Skip to content

SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization

SakuraBead Used as Resorbable Embolic for Genicular Artery Embolization

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06550024
Acronym
SURE
Enrollment
89
Registered
2024-08-12
Start date
2024-11-28
Completion date
2028-10-01
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Osteoarthritis, Osteo Arthritis Knee, Rheumatic Diseases

Keywords

Genicular Artery Embolization, GAE, Knee Embolization, Knee OA, Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

An open label, prospective, two-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing SakuraBead genicular artery embolization (GAE) with a control (corticosteroid injection).

Detailed description

To compare safety and efficacy of SakuraBead with corticosteroid injection for the treatment of pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis. Treatment will be performed on a total of approximately 89 patients who will be followed up for a period of 2 years.

Interventions

Temporary Embolization of Genicular Arteries using SakuraBead Resorbable Microspheres

DRUGCorticosteroid Injection

Corticosteroid injection in the knee

Sponsors

CrannMed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is able and willing to provide written informed consent, and 2. Clinical diagnosis of knee OA, and 3. Moderate to severe knee pain (WOMAC Pain ≥ 10), and 4. Pain refractory to at least 3 months of conservative therapies (anti-inflammatory drugs, or physical therapy, or intra-articular injections), and 5. Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1, 2 or 3 on radiograph of the knee, and 6. Age ≥ 40 years and \< 80 years, and 7. Able to comply with all treatments and follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4), or 2. Current infection of target joint, or 3. Life expectancy less than 36 months, or 4. Known advanced atherosclerosis as defined by history of lower extremity or pelvis arterial bypass graft, lower extremity or pelvis arterial stent placement or prior history of vascular claudication, or 5. Rheumatoid or known serologic diagnosis of autoimmune arthritis, or 6. Prior knee replacement surgery in the target knee, or 7. Pain score of \>3 NRS on the non-target knee, or 8. An acute internal derangement of the target knee, or 9. History of uncorrectable coagulopathy, or 10. Prior iodinated contrast reaction resulting in anaphylaxis, or 11. Active pregnancy as demonstrated by urine or serum β-hCG, or lactating female, or planning pregnancy in the following 12 months, or 12. Has undergone an invasive treatment (including but not limited to: corticosteroid injection, hyaluronic acid injections, nerve ablation) in the target knee within the past 3 months, or 13. Contraindication to MRI, or 14. At the discretion of the Principal Investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Proportion of Responders6 MonthsCompare the proportion of responders\* (defined as ≥50% reduction in WOMAC Pain\*\* score and ≥2 point reduction in NRS\*\*\*) between the Investigational procedure and Control at 6 months. * Non-responders will include subjects experiencing device-related SAEs. \*\*Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Pain Index. Scale: 0-20, where a lower score represents a better outcome \*\*\*NRS: Numeric Rating Scale that measures pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 points (worst pain).
Primary Safety Endpoint - Freedom from treatment-related SAEs6 MonthsFreedom from treatment-related serious adverse events (SAE) through 6 months following the index procedure (proportions will be compared between Investigational procedure and Control).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Responders at 1 Month and 3 Month1 Month and 3 MonthsCompare the proportion of responders\* (defined as ≥50% reduction in WOMAC Pain\*\* score and ≥2 point reduction in NRS\*\*\*) between the Investigational procedure and Control at 1 Month and 3 Months. * Non-responders will include subjects experiencing device-related SAEs. \*\*Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Pain Index. Scale: 0-20, where a lower score represents a better outcome \*\*\*NRS: Numeric Rating Scale that measures pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 points (worst pain).
Change in mean WOMAC Pain1 Month, 3 Months and 6 MonthsCompare mean change from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index Pain (WOMAC Pain, Scale: 0-20, where a lower score represents a better outcome) between the Investigational procedure and Control at 1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months.
Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)1 Month, 3 Months and 6 MonthsCompare mean decrease in pain (measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)) between the Investigational procedure and Control at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Scale: 0-10, where a lower score means a better outcome.

Countries

Georgia, United Kingdom, United States, Uzbekistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026