Skip to content

A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Effectiveness of Intradermally Injected JUVÉDERM® VOLITE™ Gel Filler in Adult Participants For the Improvement of Skin Quality

Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, No-Treatment Controlled Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of JUVÉDERM® VOLITE™ Injectable Gel for the Improvement in Skin Quality

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06547125
Enrollment
135
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
2024-07-18
Completion date
2026-02-05
Last updated
2026-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Quality Deficit

Keywords

Skin Quality Deficit, Juvederm Volite, AGN-8015

Brief summary

Facial fine lines and wrinkles are caused by skin thinning, loss of moisture, and loss of elasticity due to factors such as age, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and environmental exposures. Today, many injectable fillers are used to treat facial aging and correct skin defects. In this study, adverse effects and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLITE™ will be assessed in the treatment of fine lines and improving skin quality. VOLITE is an investigational device being developed for improving skin quality. In this study, participants are placed in 1 of 2 groups, called treatment arms. Each group receives a different treatment. There is a 1 in 3 chance that participants will be assigned to the no-treatment control group. Adult participants seeking improvement of skin quality, especially hydration and radiance, in the treatment area will be enrolled. Around 135 participants will be enrolled in the study at approximately 6 sites in China. Participants in the treatment group will receive the initial injection of VOLITE; the control group will receive no treatment, but will have the opportunity to receive VOLITE after 2 months. Participants will be followed up for 12 months. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects, and completing questionnaires.

Interventions

Injection, intradermal

OTHERControl

No-treatment control

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fitzpatrick skin types II-IV * Participants' FACE-Q Satisfaction with Skin Scale scores must meet the following criteria: * Participants must have FACE-Q Satisfaction with Skin Scale sum of raw scores of 39 or less * Participants must score "Very Dissatisfied" or "Somewhat Dissatisfied" on the following two questions: * How hydrated your facial skin looks? * How radiant your facial skin looks?

Exclusion criteria

* Any skin condition in the face area that might not be suitable for injection * Uncontrolled systemic disease * History of anaphylactic shock, or allergy to lidocaine (or any amide-based anesthetics), hyaluronic acid (HA) products, or Streptococcal protein, or is planning to undergo desensitization therapy during the study * Active autoimmune disease * Tendency to develop hypertrophic scarring * Currently undergoing chemotherapy/radiotherapy * Is undergoing orthodontia before enrollment or is planning to undergo it during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs)Up to approximately Month 12An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or any untoward clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in participants, users, or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device, and whether anticipated or unanticipated.
Percentage of Participants Achieving "Responder" Status for Evaluating Investigator's (EI) Live Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement in Skin Quality on the Treatment Area Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)Month 2A "responder" is a participant who shows improvement in the overall aesthetic assessment on the treatment area using GAIS. GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from 'Very Much Improved' to 'Worse'.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving "Responder" Status for Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement in Skin Quality on the Treatment Area using GAISMonth 2A "responder" is a participant who shows improvement in the overall aesthetic assessment in the treatment area using GAIS. GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from 'Very Much Improved' to 'Worse'.
Percentage of Participants Achieving "Responder" Status for Treating Investigator's (TI) Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement of Skin Quality on the Treatment Area using GAISMonth 2A "responder" is a participant who shows improvement in the overall aesthetic assessment in the treatment area using GAIS. GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from 'Very Much Improved' to 'Worse'.
Change from Baseline on the Overall Score of FACE-Q Satisfaction with Skin ScaleMonth 2The FACE Q Satisfaction with Skin is a validated 12-item scale that asks subjects to report their level of satisfaction with how their facial skin looked "in the past week." Response options are on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from Very dissatisfied to Very Satisfied. Total score is Rasch transformed from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Percentage of Participants with Responder Status based on EI's Live Assessments of Hydration Improvement on the Treatment Area Using the Aesthetic Improvement Scale for HydrationMonth 2A "responder" is a participant who shows aesthetic improvement in hydration of the treatment area ("Improved," "Much Improved," or "Very Much Improved" on the scale).
Change from Baseline in Treatment Area Skin Elasticity MeasurementMonth 2The trained designee will measure skin elasticity using the assigned instrument at the designated study visits.
Percentage of Participants with Responder Status based on EI's Live Assessments of Radiance Improvement on the Treatment Area Using the Aesthetic Improvement Scale for RadianceMonth 2A "responder" is a participant who shows aesthetic improvement in radiance of the treatment area ("Improved," "Much Improved," or "Very Much Improved" on the scale).
Change from Baseline in Treatment Area Skin Hydration MeasurementMonth 2The trained designee will measure skin hydration using the assigned instrument at the designated study visits.

Countries

China

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORABBVIE INC.

AbbVie

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026