Skip to content

Is Conditioned Pain Modulation Predictive of Clinical Improvement in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain?

Is Conditioned Pain Modulation Predictive of Clinical Improvement in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain?

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06544525
Enrollment
57
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
2024-09-19
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

low back pain, physical therapy, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation

Brief summary

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) a measure of the effectiveness of the descending pain pathway and therefore a measure of the body's ability to perform endogenous analgesia. In subjects with normal function of the descending pain pathway, the net-effect during CPM testing is anti-nociceptive, or inhibition of the ascending pain pathway. In those with impaired descending pain pathway function, the response to CPM testing is pro-nociceptive, indicating that the body is unable to inhibit the pain signal, or may even amplify it. There is literature that supports the presence of impaired CPM, and therefore impaired descending pain pathway function, in numerus chronic pain conditions, including low back pain. Impaired descending pain pathway function may be contributing to this chronic pain presentation. This study will give us information on whether a typical physical therapy plan of care is able to improve impaired CPM, and if CPM values are predictive of improvement in physical therapy.

Interventions

OTHERPhysical therapy

The intervention will be physical therapy standard of care.

Sponsors

Brooke Army Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study will be a quasi-experimental, one-group repeated measures design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* DEERS eligible * English speaking * Age 18-64 years * ODI baseline ≥25% * NPRS baseline ≥3/10 * Low back pain symptoms greater than 3 months * Must be able to commit to at least six weeks of physical therapy interventions

Exclusion criteria

* Serious spinal pathology (acute fracture, active cancer, inflammation, inflammatory arthropathy) * Low back pain symptoms radiating below the knee * Pregnancy * Diagnosed neurological disease including traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, chronic regional pain syndrome, and fibromyalgia. * History spinal surgery * Currently under litigation related to low back pain * Currently going through Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) * Retiring or separating from the military within a year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Oswestry Disability IndexFrom enrollment until end of study at 6 weeks.The ODI will be the primary outcome for this study. The ODI contains 10 items that assess function and disability (0 = no disability, 100 = maximal disability).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Central Sensitization InventoryFrom enrollment until study end at 6 weeks.The CSI is a 25-item questionnaire that assesses symptoms common to central sensitization syndromes using a 0-100-point scale, in which 100 indicates a higher level of symptoms common to central sensitization.
Conditioned pain modulationFrom enrollment until study end at 6 weeks.CPM calculation: It is recommended that CPM response be reported as an absolute value and percent change. The calculation for absolute value is: CPM = PPTpre -PPTconditioning. PPTpre is the testing stimulus conducted before conditioning stimulus application and PPTconditioning is the testing stimulus conducted during conditioning stimulation. This is expressed in kPa. A negative value suggests that CPM is functioning effectively and indicative of an anti-nociceptive profile, while a positive value suggests CPM is impaired and indicative of a pro-nociceptive profile. The second method will be CPM expressed as percent change of the testing stimulus before and during the application of the conditioning stimulus. The equation for percent change is: \[(postPPT - prePPT)/prePPT\] \* 100. CPM will be expressed as continuous ratio data via absolute value and percent change. The absolute value score will be used for the statistical model and will be collected at baseline and follow up.
Temporal SummationFrom enrollment until study end at 6 weeks.Temporal summation is calculated as follows: VAS10th - VAS1st. A positive number indicates the magnitude of temporal summation of pain. This will be expressed as continuous ratio data and will be collected at baseline and follow up.
Numeric pain rating scaleFrom enrollment until study end (6 weeks).The NPRS is an 11-point numerical pain rating scale used to measure pain. Patients rate pain ranging between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain imaginable). This will be measured as the mean of three pain ratings: best pain rating over 24 hours, worst pain rating over 24 hours, and current pain rating.
Global rating of change scaleFrom enrollment until end of study (6 weeks)The GRC utilized in this study is an 11-point scale designed to quantify a patient's improvement or deterioration over time. The GRC will only be completed at discharge (6-weeks).

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactKyle R Petrey, DPT
kyle.r.petrey.mil@health.mil8472742794

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026