Asymmetric Limb Muscle Stiffness, Body Schema, Recovery, Psychological
Conditions
Keywords
Virtual Reality Training, Physical, Recovery, Sports Psychology, Skill
Brief summary
This study exploring the effects of virtual reality basketball asymmetric training on the technical and tactical ability of professional basketball players (male and female) through the use of virtual reality devices.
Detailed description
The experimental conclusion of this study was obtained by comparing virtual reality basketball asymmetric training with traditional basketball asymmetric training (using cRCT random experimental grouping)
Interventions
BEHAVIORALVirtual reality basketball asymmetric training
This study established two experimental groups, namely the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group received virtual reality device assisted training, while the control group received traditional training
BEHAVIORALTraditional basketball asymmetric training
This study established two experimental groups, namely the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group received virtual reality device assisted training, while the control group received traditional training
Sponsors
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Intervention model description
Experimental Group (virtual reality training) & Control Group (traditional training)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 29 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Asymmetric limbs * Psychological defects * Joint stiffness * Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Exclusion criteria
* Physically and mentally healthy individuals * Schizophrenia patients * Cognitive impairment patients
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effects of Asymmetric Training in Virtual Reality Basketball on The Complex Technical Completion Scores of Professional Basketball players | Pretest：July 27th Post-test 1：August 25th Post-test 2：September 22nd | Examine the effect of virtual reality training across pretest, post-test 1, and post-test 2 on asymmetrical scores of complex technical abilities in terms of professional basketball players' dribbling, driving, passing, and rebounding in China. This study used DJ Osmo Action 3 camera and GoPose software to capture, measure, and analyze the basketball technique movements of the experimental subjects. The specific measurements are listed below： Technical Completion Rate (0/100 points) Technical Connection Rate (0/100 points) |
| Effects of Asymmetric Training in Virtual Reality Basketball on The Complex Technical Completion Rate of Professional Basketball players | Pretest：July 27th Post-test 1：August 25th Post-test 2：September 22nd | Examine the effect of virtual reality training across pretest, post-test 1, and post-test 2 on asymmetrical rate of complex technical abilities in terms of professional basketball players' shooting, layup and defensive in China. This study used DJ Osmo Action 3 camera and GoPose software to capture, measure, and analyze the basketball technique movements of the experimental subjects. The specific measurements are listed below： Technical Accuracy Rate (%) Technology Success Rate (%) |
| Effects of Asymmetric Training in Virtual Reality Basketball on Complex Tactics Scores of Professional Basketball Players | Pretest：July 27th Post-test 1：August 25th Post-test 2：September 22nd | Examine the effect of virtual reality training across pretest, post-test 1, and post-test 2 on asymmetrical scores level of tactical abilities in terms of professional basketball players' 3-man organized offense, 3-man organized defense, 4-man organized offense, 4-man organized defense, 5-man organized offense and 5-man organized defense in China. This study used DJ Osmo Action 3 camera and Dartfish software to capture, measure, and analyze the basketball tactical execution process of the experimental subjects. The specific measurements are listed below： Tactical Completion Rate (0/100 points) Tactical Connection (0/100 points) Tactical Decision-making Ability (0/100 points) Tactical Selection Accuracy (0/100 points) Tactical SuccessRate (0/100 points) |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed