Skip to content

Evaluation of Template Assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multi-Shade Direct Composite Veneers

Evaluation of Template Assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multi-Shade Direct Composite Veneers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06543654
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
2022-07-19
Completion date
2024-04-09
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Discoloration

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to conduct a clinical trial utilizing a modified split-mouth, double-blinded, randomized strategy to clinically assess template assisted one shade structural colored versus universal multi-shade direct composite veneers

Detailed description

The superior mechanical qualities, superb aesthetics, and versatility of resin-based composites (RBCs) make them popular choices for direct restorative applications. Compared to their predecessors, nanocomposites have shown superior qualities since nanotechnology was introduced in the production of dental RBCs. A restoration's aesthetic integration is mostly the result of its chromatic characteristics. Pigments included in the composition of the restorative material typically control the selective reflection of wavelengths to emulate the natural tooth. In order to better reflect the broad color range that characterizes real dentition, RBCs have more recently employed the phenomena of structural color . Thanks to the novel property of resins, color differences between the tooth and the restoration are eliminated or balanced out as perceived color of a region moves toward the color of the surrounding area . Additionally, as opposed to multi-shade RBCs, single-shade RBCs eliminate the need to select between various resin shades, streamlining the color choosing procedure and cutting down on time lost during the clinical resin selection process. The Vita Classic Shade Guide's shades can all be matched with these materials.

Interventions

Each participants had two kinds of veneers

Ceram. X Spectra

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This clinical trial was double-blind since the evaluators who were not included in the restorative procedures and the participants were blinded to tested groups, but the operator wasn't blinded to these groups

Intervention model description

randomized controlled clinical study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* better dental hygiene * discolored vital anterior teeth

Exclusion criteria

* Para functional activities * Non-vital teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline, six, nine, twelve, and eighteen months by two calibrated examiners using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteriaeighteen monthsThe perfect clinical scenario was represented by a score of 0, clinically acceptable by a score of 1, dubious by a score of 2, and clinically unsatisfactory by a score of 3 and 4.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026