Skip to content

Comparison Between the Effects of Implantable Gestrinone and Oral Dienogest in the Treatment of Endometriosis

Comparison Between the Effects of Implantable Gestrinone and Oral Dienogest in the Treatment of Endometriosis: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06543550
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
2024-07-30
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis

Keywords

Endometriosis, Implantable Gestrinone, Dienogest

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of therapy with implantable Gestrinone compared to oral Dienogest in relieving complaints related to endometriosis.

Detailed description

Patient recruitment will be carried out on a prospective basis and based on the group of patients from the private Medical Clinics in 4 cities (Campina Grande - Pb, São Paulo - SP, São José dos Campos - SP and Brasilia-DF). The study will include 70 adult female patients of menstrual age, pre-menopause (18 to 45 years old), who seek medical treatment to alleviate complaints related to endometriosis. The selected patients will be randomly allocated into two groups, in a 1:1 ratio. Control Group (n=35) - treatment with oral Dienogest - and Test Group (n=35) - Implantation of Gestrinone pellets. Follow-up visits will be scheduled after 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of initiation of therapy. Therapies will be compared with respect to the effects on the severity of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia and non-cyclical pelvic pain (Verbal Scale and Visual Analogue Scale), level of Uterine Bleeding assessed by PBAC, systemic effects (hormonal, hepatic, lipid profile, cell concentration red, clotting factor - assessed through blood tests), endometriosis lesions, endometrial thickness (transvaginal ultrasound), body composition (bioimpendance test), quality of life (EHP30) and sexual function (female sexual function index ) - FSFI. Data analysis will be carried out using validated statistical software. Chi-square or Fisher&#39;s exact tests will be used to compare qualitative variables, while independent t-tests will be used to compare quantitative variables between the two groups. Analysis of variance with repeated measures will be used to compare the average pain intensity over time. The significance level for all tests will be p<0.05.

Interventions

DRUGImplantable gestrinone

1.6mg/kg of weight of gestrinone in pellets (bio meds Brasil, Florianópolis, Brazil) subcutaneously, in the gluteal region.

DRUGOral Dienogest

Administered orally at 2 mg daily

Sponsors

Bio Meds Pharmaceutica Ltda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult female patients of menstrual age, pre-menopause (18 to 45 years old), who seek medical treatment to alleviate complaints related to endometriosis, who are not undergoing other therapies to treat them. * Patients must have a diagnosis of Grade 1 or 2 endometriosis assessed by imaging tests (ultrasound with bowel preparation and/or MRI of the pelvis with bowel preparation)14, have a BMI of up to 25kg/m2, and weigh between 50 and 70kg.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant patients (supporting test must be presented) * Breastfeeding women, using other hormonal contraceptive methods or copper or silver IUDs, who have polycystic ovaries, and/or hyperandrogenism. * Patients using medications that may interfere with androgen metabolism within 4 weeks of screening or during the study. * Patients with a history of liver disease, cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, unstable angina or heart failure), active hepatitis, liver neoplasia or renal failure * Patient who are scheduled for surgical treatment during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of dysmenorrhea severityPre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3 , 6 and 12 monthsPatients will be instructed to rate the intensity of dysmenorrhea at each visit after the first month of treatment, using a modified verbal scale from 0 to 3, as suggested by Biberoglu and Behrman. Patients should also rate the intensity of the symptoms using a 100 mm visual analogue scale.
Evaluation of dyspareunia severityPre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3 , 6 and 12 monthsPatients will be instructed to rate the intensity of deep dyspareunia at each visit after the first month of treatment, using a modified verbal scale from 0 to 3, as suggested by Biberoglu and Behrman. Patients should also rate the intensity of the symptoms using a 100 mm visual analogue scale.
Evaluation of non-cyclical pelvic pain severityPre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3 , 6 and 12 monthsPatients will be instructed to rate the intensity of pelvic pain (outside the menstrual period), at each visit after the first month of treatment, using a modified verbal scale from 0 to 3, as suggested by Biberoglu and Behrman. Patients should also rate the intensity of the symptoms using a 100 mm visual analogue scale.
Evaluation of endometriosis foci regressionPre-treatment, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment of endometriosis lesions and endometrial thickness on Transvaginal Ultrasound with bowel preparation and/or MRI of the pelvis with bowel preparation - All patients will be referred, at pre-treatment and at 6 and 12 month visits, to undergo transvaginal ultrasound to assess the presence or absence of endometriotic lesions, in addition to controlling the thickness of the endometrium.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of quality of lifePre-treatment, 6 and 12 monthsThe evaluation of the influence of complaints on the impact of endometriosis on patients' quality of life will be carried out using the EHP-30 questionnaires validated for the Portuguese language.
Evaluation of body compositionPre-treatment, 3 , 6 and 12 monthsBody composition will be assessed using the tetrapolar Bioimpedance test with the Indoby device (weight, percentage of lean mass and fat mass)
Evaluation of adverse effectPre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3 , 6 and 12 monthsEvaluation of sings and symptoms. In addition, it will be evaluated at each visit the serum levels of Estradiol, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Progesterone, Total and free Testosterone, FSH, LH, Hepatic transaminase (TGO, TGP, GGT), Total cholesterol and fractions, Triglycerides, Red cell concentration, Coagulation factors , Homocysteine, Fibrinogen, DHT.
Evaluation of abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB)Pre-treatment, 1, 3 , 6 and 12 monthsThe duration and intensity of menstrual flow will be recorded pre-treatment and at each visit after the first month of treatment. Abnormal uterine bleeding will be defined as a PBAC (Pictorial blood loss assessment chart) score greater than 100.
Evaluation of sexual functionPre-treatment, 1 week, 1, 3 , 6 and 12 monthsThe assessment of sexual function (desire, excitement, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain) will be carried out through the application of the Female Sexual Function Index.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactAndré V. A. Florentino, Dr
f.andrevinicius@gmail.com+55 83 982001868

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026