Skip to content

Low-Cost Platelet-Rich Plasma for Hemarthropathy

Low-Cost Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for the Management of Hemarthropathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06543368
Enrollment
14
Registered
2024-08-09
Start date
2024-07-23
Completion date
2025-05-05
Last updated
2026-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemarthrosis, Hemophilia

Keywords

Hemophilia, Hemarthrosis, PRP, Platelet Rich Plasma

Brief summary

Orthopedic complications can be injuries or diseases that affect the bones, muscles, and joints. Hemarthropathy is due to bleeding disorders, most commonly hemophilia, and can result in severe issues related to chronic amounts of blood in the body's joints. This causes swelling, pain, and loss of joint function. A serious barrier to treating many patients with bleeding disorders creates higher health risks and costs. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is a method that can reduce the cost of care while still offering a similar standard of care for patients. This study intends to show that low-cost PRP can be done safely in patients with bleeding disorders, without the need for expensive equipment, while monitoring patient treatment results. Study participants will receive injections for joint conditions. Being in the study requires attending 1 to 2 in-person visits at the study clinic. Participants will also complete surveys using email, text messages, in person, and/or on the phone. Participation lasts about 6 months.

Detailed description

This study will be performed as a prospective, single arm study. Consecutive patients eligible for a standard-of-care injection will be enrolled from the Utah Center for Bleeding and Clotting Disorders. The University of Utah non-operative sports medicine team currently performs hundreds of injections monthly, and the PI works closely with the orthopedic complaints of patients with bleeding disorders. From a research standpoint, the investigators have successfully performed numerous randomized controlled prospective trials on a variety of musculoskeletal conditions in the past and have already validated this method on a large cohort of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Potential subjects will then be approached by a member of the research team to discuss the consideration of taking part in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria of this study project. Using all forms of good clinical practice, a member of the study team will review with the participant the Informed Consent Form, allow participant to read the informed consent (ICF) and ask questions prior to signing the ICF. Potential subjects may also be asked by other physicians or staff members familiar with the study. Low Cost-Platelet Rich Plasma (LC-PRP) preparation method: See Documents for full details. This method follows the same procedures as the standard-of-care, FDA-cleared method used by numerous commercial machines; thus it does not require additional FDA clearance or approval. To summarize the full method in the appendix, 45mL of blood is drawn from the subject in a standard-of-care manner into 3 x 20mL syringes, each containing 2mL of sodium citrate (anticoagulant). Each syringe is prepared and capped, then placed into a centrifuge. The resulting separated blood is then drawn off into a single new sterile syringe, which can be used for the injection. Blood and PRP analysis: The investigators will perform a full analysis (a complete blood count (CBC) with differential) on subjects' whole blood and their prepared LC-PRP. Importantly, the investigators will include all data required in the PRP minimum reporting standards, including "platelet, differential leukocyte, and red cell analysis of all samples." Also note that although the investigators are collecting these values for the purposes of the study, CBC values are not needed in the community. Injections: A total of 20 joints (estimated 10-15 patients) will receive injections, performed at day 0 and 3 weeks, for a total of two injections - two injections have demonstrated superior outcomes to one, and will increase our number of injections to improve the proof of feasibility. All subjects will receive ultrasound-guided intra-articular joint injections by an experienced sports medicine provider after local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine to the extra-articular structures, namely the skin and joint capsule, to increase comfort. Note: though the investigators are using ultrasound guidance to ensure that they are guaranteeing accurate injectate placement for this study, this is not necessarily required in the community setting. These will be performed after the patient's typical factor infusions, if applicable. Questionnaire: The investigators will collect demographic information along with baseline and subsequent functional patient reported outcomes, namely the WOMAC (knee), FAOS (ankle), and the QuickDASH (elbow). REDCap will be used to administer surveys and store data. The investigators will additionally ask about adverse events, pain, global satisfaction, global injection satisfaction, and medications. Data collection time points and follow-up: Follow-up data (see timeline below) will be administered electronically. Subjects will be queried by email, text message, in person, and/or by telephone regarding treatment outcomes at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months after the second injection. Three months will be the primary endpoint, and six months will be an exploratory, unfunded endpoint. * LC-PRP Outcomes: As this is a feasibility study, it is likely that this study will be underpowered for clinical outcomes. However, the investigators will still monitor pain and the above outcome measures and identify potential time-related improvements. * Economic Evaluation: The investigators will track staff-, time-, equipment-, and supply-related costs to accurately identify costs associated with each injection. This will ensure that costs are accurately recorded.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIntra articular PRP Injection

A total of 20 joints (estimated 10-15 patients) will receive injections, performed at day 0 and 3 weeks, for a total of two injections - two injections have demonstrated superior outcomes to one, and will increase our number of injections to improve the proof of feasibility. All subjects will receive ultrasound-guided intra-articular joint injections by an experienced sports medicine provider after local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine to the extra-articular structures, namely the skin and joint capsule, to increase comfort.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of any adult age with symptomatic hemarthropathy of the ankle, knee, or elbow, based on radiographs within the last 24 months. * Patients must have failed at least six weeks of conventional conservative treatments (such as medication or physical therapy).

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Satisfaction (Numeric Rating System)6-monthsGlobal patient satisfaction was assessed prospectively at 6 months following the intervention using a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 100. Participants were asked to rate their overall satisfaction with the treatment outcome, where 0 represented "not satisfied" and 100 represented "completely satisfied." The score reflects the participant's overall perception of their injection, including symptom improvement and overall experience.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)6-monthsDescription: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a validated measure designed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Structure: The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into three subscales: Pain (5 items): pain during walking, using stairs, lying/sitting, standing, and at night. Stiffness (2 items): stiffness after first waking and later in the day. Physical Function (17 items): difficulty with daily activities such as rising from sitting, bending, walking, getting in/out of a car, shopping, and stair use. Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (none) - 4 (extreme) Scoring: Subscale scores are summed - Pain: 0-20 Stiffness: 0-8 Physical Function: 0-68 The total score is the sum of all items (range 0-96), with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
Quick Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH)6-monthsThe Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) is a validated outcome measure designed to assess physical function and symptoms in individuals with upper-extremity musculoskeletal conditions. Structure: The QuickDASH consists of 11 items derived from the original 30-item DASH questionnaire. Items assess: Difficulty performing common physical tasks. Severity of upper-extremity symptoms. Impact on sleep, work, and social activities Optional modules (Work and Sports/Performing Arts) may each be added as separate 4-item scales if relevant. Response Scale: Likert scale ranging from 1 (No difficulty / No symptom) to 5 (Unable to do / Extreme symptom) Scoring: Items are averaged, converted to a 0-100 scale using the formula: ((mean score - 1) × 25) Total score range: 0-100, where higher scores indicate greater disability and worse upper-extremity function.
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): Function6-monthsThe Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) functional score is a validated measure designed to assess the functional limitations of the foot and ankle Structure: The functional portion of the FAOS consists of 17 items related to activities of Daily Living Response Scale: Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from: 0 (No problems) - 4 (Extreme problems) Scoring: Each subscale scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale using: Individual scores are totaled 100 - (((functional score total) × 100) /68) Score range per subscale: 0-100, where 100 represents no symptoms and full function, and 0 represents extreme symptoms and maximal functional limitations

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients who are eligible for a standard-of-care injection were enrolled from the Utah Center for Bleeding and Clotting Disorders. If the participant appeared to be a candidate, he or she was invited to participate.

Pre-assignment details

This was an open-label study; therefore, no randomization was performed. The joint enrolled was selected collaboratively by the principal investigator and the patient, based on which joint was causing the greatest symptoms. In some cases, participants had more than one joint enrolled (e.g., one knee and one ankle), accounting for the difference between the number of participants (n=14) and the number of units/joints enrolled (n=20).

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants
Baseline Satisfaction with Joint
Neither satisfied nor unsatisfied
1 Joints
Baseline Satisfaction with Joint
Satisfied
2 Joints
Baseline Satisfaction with Joint
Unsatisfied
14 Joints
Baseline Satisfaction with Joint
Very Satisfied
0 Joints
Baseline Satisfaction with Joint
Very unsatisfied
3 Joints
Hemophilia Severity
Mild
2 Participants
Hemophilia Severity
Moderate
1 Participants
Hemophilia Severity
Severe
11 Participants
Hemophilia Type
Hemophilia type A
12 Participants
Hemophilia Type
Hemophilia type B
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 27, 2026