Skip to content

Plating Versus Nailing in Pediatric BB Forearm Fractures

Dual Intramedullary Nailing Fixation Versus Dual Plating of Pediatric Both Bone Forearm Fracture: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06542471
Acronym
DINDPL
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-08-07
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2024-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Forearm Fracture, Intramedullary Nail, Plate Fixation, Randomized Controlled Trial

Keywords

forearm fractures, pediatric fractures, flexible nail, plate fixation

Brief summary

A randomized controlled trial to compare between dual intramedullary nailing and dual plating trying to synthesis a high quality evidence study that can solve the conflict between the decisions.

Interventions

DEVICEDual intramedullary nailing

\- Elastic nailing for radius under image guidance through distal entry point and physeal sparing technique.

\- ORIF for radius done first through volar approach.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Both-bone Forearm Diaphyseal Fracture. 2. age more than or equal nine years old with open distal radius physis. 3. Simple transverse or short oblique fractures (2R2-A2,2R2-A3,2U2-A2,2U2-A3) according to OTA/ AO classification.

Exclusion criteria

1. Neurovascular injury. 2. Open fractures 3. Comminuted fractures 4. Pathological fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient satisfaction questionnaire6 monthsfive points Likert scale
Time to union6 monthsweeks required to achieve union
Elbow range of motion6 monthselbow flexion, extension, pronation and supination in degrees
Quick DASH score6 monthsPatient reported questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events6 monthsAny adverse event will be recorded
Re-operation rate6 monthspercentage of patients requiring reoperation
size of wound scar in millimeters6 monthsmeasuring the size of wound scar in millimeters
Deformity (malunion rate)6 monthsMalunion deformity

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026