Skip to content

Can Endotracheal Tube Fluctuation With Epigastric Compression Be Used as a Confirmation Method for Endotracheal Intubation?

Can the Fluctuation Observed in the Endotracheal Tube With Compression Applied to the Epigastric Region be Used as a Confirmation Method for Endotracheal Intubation?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06542406
Enrollment
78
Registered
2024-08-07
Start date
2021-02-18
Completion date
2023-03-04
Last updated
2024-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, Intratracheal

Keywords

endotracheal intubation, esophageal placement, epigastric fluctuation

Brief summary

Endotracheal intubation (ETE) may also need to be performed outside the hospital as advanced airway management. In such cases, facilities such as imaging methods, ultrasound or capnography may not be available and only traditional methods such as auscultation of lung sounds, auscultation of the epigastric region without hearing airflow, observation of chest expansion after ventilation, observation of water vapor in the tube may have to be used. Despite all these observational methods and equipment used, it is recommended to keep in mind that there may be errors and to try to provide confirmation with more than one method. Especially in disaster situations where technological infrastructure is not available and sometimes outside the hospital, the use of traditional methods based on examination may be of vital importance. The traditional methods mentioned above are mostly used to detect tracheal localization and to exclude esophageal localization. In our observations in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest, the investigators noticed that in the case of esophageal placement of the tube, manual compression of the epigastric region produced a fluctuation in the tube and valved balloon caused by airflow. The investigators thought that this could be a method to confirm esophageal placement. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of epigastric manual compression in the confirmation of esophageal placement of the tube.

Detailed description

Patients who underwent ETE outside the hospital or in the first hour of arrival to the emergency department were evaluated after the procedure. Out-of-hospital ETE was performed by experienced paramedics working in the emergency ambulance service, and ETE in the emergency department was performed by emergency medicine residents or emergency medicine specialists with at least 2 years of emergency department experience. Out-of-hospital procedures were performed at the first visit to the emergency department, and procedures performed in the emergency department were confirmed by ETE immediately after the procedure. Confirmation was performed single-blind by emergency medicine specialists with at least 5 years of experience, without knowing who performed the procedure and where (in or out of the hospital). Confirmation was performed by auscultation of lung sounds (from the anterior and lateral sides of both lungs, upper and lower zones), evaluation of equal participation of both thoraxes in breathing by inspection, auscultation of the epigastric region, placement of capnography, monitoring of water vapor in the tube, manual compression of the epigastric region at least three times and evaluation of fluctuation in the tube, and pulse oximetry monitoring. Epigastric compression was performed by applying pressure to the epigastric region at least three times with the volar side of the intubated patient while the patient was ventilated with a balloon-valved mask. During this procedure, the fluctuation of the air and fluid in the stomach inside the esophageal tube can be observed and its sound can be heard. It can be applied from the first inhalation. The ultrasonography (USG) procedure was evaluated by placing a linear ultrasound probe \[SonoSite M-Turbo linear probe (13-6 MHz), Sonosite, Inc, Bothell, WA, USA\] in the transverse position on the anterior side of the neck, just above the suprasternal notch, and observing the position of the tube (presence of a double path sign) and pleural sliding movement. While a single semicircular echogenic area is observed when the tube is in the trachea, a second semicircular echogenic area is observed when the tube is located in the esophagus. USG was performed immediately after the ETE procedure. In patients in whom double pathway sign was observed and pleural sliding motion was not observed, the patient was re-intubated by the experienced specialist performing USG. It was confirmed by USG again. These procedures were categorized as failed. partial endtidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) measurement by capnography was performed using a mainstream EMMA® Capnograph (PHASEIN AB Svärdvägen, Danderyd, Sweden) for intubated patients. It was assessed by the detection of PETCO2 greater than 5 mmHg after five breaths and the appearance of a typical square waveform.

Interventions

DEVICEEndotracheal intubation

The first 40 successful and the first 40 unsuccessful ETE procedures were included in the study.

Sponsors

Duzce University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Older than 18 years of age * Underwent ETE outside the hospital or within the first hour of arrival to the emergency department

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in whom ETE was previously confirmed by USG or PETCO2, * Patients intubated at external centers * Patients who had known airway stenosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Confirmation with ultrasonography: Successful or Failed13 monthsFluctuation with Epigastric Compression: Yes or No Failed Successful Failed

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026