UV Dental Implant
Conditions
Keywords
Dental Implants
Brief summary
Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants.
Detailed description
Research is to compare and evaluate the primary and secondary implant stability, healing of the soft tissue around UV activated implants and conventional implants. The objectives are to access the primary and secondary implant stability using Resonance frequency analysis, marginal bone level using RVG with grid, healing of the soft tissue. The control group will be treated with conventional implant and test group will be treated with UV implants. The total number of participants are 12 and 24 sites (control - 12 sites, test - 12 sites) with 3 months follow up.
Interventions
PROCEDUREconventional implant
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia, osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions and parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. Conventional implant placement was done on one side. Resonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and check the primary stability of the implant. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures.
PROCEDUREUV implant
A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated under local anesthesia and osteotomy sites were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions. Parallel pin was used to confirm position and angulation of osteotomy site. UV implant was activated using UV Activator2 and placed in another site. Resonance frequency analysis instrument was used to measure Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and primary stability of the implant was measured. The surgical wound closure was done with mattress and single interrupted sutures, using 4-0 vicryl sutures.
Sponsors
Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* At east above 18 years of age * Patients who needs replacement for at least 2 missing teeth in the posterior region of mandible * Adequate bone volume to accommodate planned dental implants * Patients who will comply with oral health care instructions and necessary visits
Exclusion criteria
* General contraindications to dental implant treatment ( uncontrolled diabetes, severe cardiovascular or infectious disease) * Intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy * Unwillingness to return for the follow up examinations * Smokers * Patients who are psychologically unable to participate * Poor oral hygiene
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability using Resonance Frequency Analysis | Immediately after Post-operative, 1 month, 3 months | to measure primary and secondary stability |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Marginal bone loss using RVG with grid | Immediately after Post-operative, 3 months | to measure marginal bone level |
| Soft tissue healing | 1 week, 1 month, 3 months. | soft tissue healing to be assessed using Landry Turnbull and Howley Healing Index. Soft tissue healing will be scored from 1 to 5, where score 1 is very poor and 5 is excellent. |
Countries
India
Contacts
Primary ContactDr. PRABHUJI MLV, MDS
Backup ContactDr. shailja dutta, mds
Outcome results
None listed