Skip to content

Study of Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Allograft (Allo-HSC) at High Risk of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)

Study of Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Allograft (Allo-HSC) at High Risk of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI): POSALLO Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06541067
Acronym
POSALLO
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-08-07
Start date
2024-11-08
Completion date
2028-11-08
Last updated
2026-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematologic Malignancy

Keywords

Hematopoietic stem cell allograft (Allo-CSH), Posaconazole, Pharmacology

Brief summary

Patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-CSH) are at high risk of infection, particularly of fungal origin. Until the 2018 recommendations of the 6th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL6), primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFI), in allograft patients, was based on the administration of fluconazole until D100. Due to changes in transplantation practices (alternative donor transplantation, sequential transplantation, etc.) and changes in microbiological ecology (increased incidence of IFIs caused by filamentous germs such as aspergillosis and mycormycosis), fluconazole prophylaxis is now sometimes suboptimal. It is therefore recommended that patients at high risk of developing IFIs should be given azole molecules with activity against filamentous agents as primary prophylaxis during the first 3 months after transplantation. Posaconazole is often under-dosed (below the minimum effective concentration). It therefore seems essential to carry out a prospective study with close \[C\]min dosing in the specific situation of allograft patients, a population that appears to be at risk of underdosing in the light of initial retrospective analysis results.

Detailed description

There are several treatments based on azole molecules: voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole... To date, none of these treatments has been approved for primary post-allograft prophylaxis. Posaconazole is indicated in cases of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy after allo-CSH), and as primary prophylaxis during aplasia in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia/myelodysplasia (AML/MDS). Other azole molecules are not approved for primary prophylaxis, and may give rise to drug interactions with certain treatments prescribed for allograft patients (e.g. ciclosporin, letermovir). Although recommendations for the administration of posaconazole as primary prophylaxis post allo-CSH have been in place for 4 years, few studies are available to date. The adult hematology department of Nantes University Hospital conducted a retrospective study of 70 allograft patients at high risk of IFI between 04/2020 and 12/2021. Posaconazole treatment was administered from D0 (or the day after the 2nd dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide) to D100. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with discontinuation due to possible treatment toxicity in 12.6% of cases, mainly of hepatic origin (n=7). Posaconazole was resumed in 2 cases without recurrence of toxicity. In 84.2% of patients, no IFI was observed. One of the limitations of this study was the low number of determinations of residual posaconazole concentration (\[C\]min). In fact, \[C\]min was carried out in only 59 patients/70, with a median delay of 9 days. In 43% of cases, the \[C\]min was insufficient (\< 0.5 mg/L), which is significantly lower than the \[C\]min obtained in patients with AML/MDS undergoing induction (\[C\]min\< 0.5 mg/L: 5% of patients). It therefore seems essential to carry out a prospective study with close \[C\]min measurement in the specific situation of allograft patients, a population that appears to be at risk of underdosing in the light of the initial retrospective results of analyses.

Interventions

DRUGPosaconazole

Per Os, on Day 0 of allo-CSH if the patient's condition permits, or after the last dose of immunosuppressor (post-transplant cyclophosphamide) (Day+5 or Day+6 depending on protocols). On the first day of treatment: 300 mg in the morning (= 3 x 100 mg tablets) and 300 mg in the evening (= 3 x 100 mg tablets), then from day 2 of treatment: 300 mg per day (= 3 x 100 mg tablets) in a single dose

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient ≥ 18 years of age. There is no maximum age for inclusion * Allo-CSH transplant for hematologic malignancy or benign hemopathy of any type with one or more high risk IFI criteria: * alternative donor (haploidentical intra-family donor, mismatch file donor, placental blood) * sequential conditioning for disease not in remission at the time of transplantation * use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) for GVH prophylaxis * patient who has previously received a HSC allograft * Written informed consent prior to protocol initiation * ECOG \<=2 * Female of childbearing age with negative pregnancy test and on highly effective contraception during treatment and for 12 months after posaconazole discontinuation * Men of childbearing age with effective contraception during treatment and for 6 months after stopping posaconazole. * Hepatitis B, C and HIV serologies negative. * Social security affiliation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of IFI, whether active or resolved at the time of allografting * Patient with known intolerance to posaconazole * Patients with concomitant treatments FORBIDDING association with posaconazole: ergot alkaloids, CYP3A4 substrates (terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, pimozide, halofantrine or quinidine), HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (simvastatin, lovastatin and atorvastatin) or any other contraindicated treatment listed in VIDAL * patients with congenital or acquired QTc prolongation (QTc \>470ms) * Cardiac: systolic ejection fraction \< 50% by transthoracic ultrasound or isotopic method (isotopic gamma-angiography) * Respiratory: DLCOc \<40% of theoretical on EFR * Renal: creatinine clearance \< 50 ml/min (assessed using MDRD method) * Hepatic: transaminases greater than 5 times normal or bilirubin greater than 2 times normal * Pregnant or breast-feeding women, * Women or men of childbearing age without effective contraception * Serious, uncontrolled concomitant infections * Yellow fever vaccination within the last year * Patient protected by law (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice) * Psychological, family, sociological or geographical conditions that may hinder compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule * Patient who does not speak or understand French * Participation in any other therapeutic study with an exclusion period still in effect at the time of inclusion or planned participation in another therapeutic study while taking posaconazole

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effective residual concentration of posaconazoleOn the 8th day of treatment (i.e. after 7 days of treatment)The main objective is to study, in the early phase after allo-CSH, the percentage of patients who have an effective residual concentration of posaconazole. The primary endpoint is plasma residual posaconazole concentration (\[C\]min), measured on day 8 of posaconazole initiation. A \[C\]min \> 0.7mg/l is considered effective.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Monitoring of residual plasma concentrations [C]minFrom posaconazole baseline up to Day100Weekly residual plasma concentrations of posaconazole
Description of circumstances leading to posaconazole underdosingFrom posaconazole baseline up to Day100A clinical record will be taken twice a week during hospitalization and then once a week to describe clinical symptoms leading to malabsorption: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, colitis. Symptom intensity will be assessed according to the NCI CTCAE v5 classification
Description of the reasons for administering posaconazole intravenously (IV)From posaconazole baseline up to Day100The physician in charge of the patient should specify the reason(s) for IV administration of the treatment
Description of situations leading to initial non-administration or early discontinuation of posaconazoleFrom posaconazole baseline up to Day100The physician in charge of the patient should specify the situation(s) that led to non-administration or early discontinuation of treatment.
Description of invasive fungal infections occurringFrom posaconazole baseline up to 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study)Description of IFI cases according to EORTC classification
Description of patient outcome: incidence of engraftmentMonth 1 post-transplantEngraftment assessed on hematological reconstitution (number of days of aplasia with PNN \<0.5 G/L and platelets \< 20, number of platelet and packed cell transfusions)
Description of patient outcome: overall survival (OS)Up to Day100 and 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study) or deathSurvival between day 0 of transplantation and date of death or last follow-up
Description of patient outcome: disease-free survival (DFS)Up to Day100 and 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study) or documented relapse or death whicvever came firstSurvival between day 0 of transplant and date of relapse, death or last follow-up
Description of patient outcome: non-relapse mortality (NRM)Up to Day100 and 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study) or death, whichever came firstAny death unrelated to relapse or disease progression
Description of patient outcome: incidence of relapse (IR)Up to Day100 and 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study) or any documented disease recurrence, whichever came firstAny documented disease recurrence
Description of patient outcome: cumulative incidence of acute GVHDUp to Day100 and 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study)Acute GVH grade 2-4 according to Mount Sinai criteria
Description of patient outcome: cumulative incidence of chronic GVHDUp to Day100 and 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study)Extensive chronic GVH according to NCI criteria
Description of patient outcome: GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS)Up to Day100 and 1 year post-transplant and/or through study completion (end of follow-up at the last visit of the last patient included in the study) or deathMedian relapse-free survival without grade 3-4 acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring systemic treatment
Grade 3 and 4 post-transplant adverse eventsUp to Day100 and 1 year post-transplantPost-transplant grade 3 and 4 adverse events (dates of occurrence) (NCI CTCAE version 5 criteria)

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTAmandine LE BOURGEOIS, MD
amandine.lebourgeois@chu-nantes.fr02 40 08 32 71

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026