Skip to content

Comparison of Visual Field Assessments Between Three Perimeters

Comparison of Visual Field Assessments Between Three Perimeters

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06539715
Enrollment
54
Registered
2024-08-06
Start date
2024-11-18
Completion date
2025-03-12
Last updated
2026-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Brief summary

A single center, prospective, randomized, comparative study of visual field assessments between the TEMPO, VisuALL, and HFA perimeters. Subjects will be assessed at 1 visit. Clinical evaluations will include MD, PSD, FT, VFI, OCT, and a questionnaire.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVisual field assessment

Automated perimetry

Sponsors

Gainesville Eye Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER
Sengi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with best-corrected visual outcomes of 20/30 or better.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to tolerate ophthalmic imaging * Any ocular or systemic conditions, that could affect VF test results, such as age-related macular degeneration, peripheral retinal disease, or severe glaucoma. The principal investigator reserves the right to declare a patient ineligible or non-evaluable based on medical evidence that indicates they are unsuitable for the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Acquisition Time (Both Eyes)Visit 1 (Day 0)The total time to complete automated perimetry in both eyes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Deviation (MD)Visit 1 (Day 0)visual field mean deviation (unit = decibels)
Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD)Visit 1 (Day 0)visual field pattern standard deviation (unit = decibels) PSD is a measure of visual field irregularity.
Foveal Threshold (FT)Visit 1 (Day 0)visual field foveal threshold (unit = decibels)
Patient QuestionnaireVisit 1 (Day 0)A series of 9 Likert style questions (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) that patients answered about the comfort, ease of use, and anxiety with each device. Strongly Agree was considered a better outcome for comfort and ease of use questions, and Strongly Disagree was considered a better outcome for anxiety questions.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORClayton Blehm, MD

North Georgia Eye Associates

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous71.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 540 / 540 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 540 / 540 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 540 / 54

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026