Skip to content

A Study to Compare Nighttime Aligners to Daytime Aligners

A Prospective, Two-armed, Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Performance, and Safety of Nighttime Aligners (Worn 10-12 Hours Day or Night) Compared to Daytime Aligners (Worn 20-22 Hours Day/Night)

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06539676
Enrollment
7
Registered
2024-08-06
Start date
2024-09-04
Completion date
2025-01-17
Last updated
2025-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aligner Therapy, Orthodontic Aligner, Teeth Straightening

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to see if Nighttime Aligners (worn 10-12 hours per day or night) are effective and safe for tooth movement and if so, how they compare with the standard Daytime aligners (worn 20-22 hours per day), in adults and children from 12 years of age and older. It will investigate the efficacy and performance of the treatments, as well as the safety of the investigational device and comparator. The main objectives are: * Comparison between the two groups concerning actual vs planned tooth movements (measured by changes in tooth position) * Comparison between the two groups concerning the incidence of device or dental related AEs. * Overall dentist and participant satisfaction with the treatment. Participants will: * Be given orthodontic aligner therapy with the Daytime (20-22h/day) or Nighttime (10-12h/day) Aligners (randomly assigned) * Attend approximately 5 study during approximately 8-10 months

Interventions

DEVICENighttime Aligners

Nighttime aligners worn 10-12 hours per day or night during 2-8 months

DEVICEDaytime Aligners

Daytime aligners worn 20-22 hours per day or night during 2-8 months

Sponsors

Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject willing to participate in the clinical study and able to understand the content of the clinical study. 2. Subject must have permanent dentition (i.e. all second molars). 3. Subject must be 12 years of age or older. 4. Subject must be able to provide and sign consent for themselves, without requiring consent to be given by a legally authorized representative. Parental consent is also required for all participants who are not of the legal age to provide consent themselves (based on participant state of residence). 5. The subject requires correction of teeth without planned extrusive movements on either or both arches. 6. The subject has no greater than 5 mm of crowding and/or spacing (based on estimation by Investigator). 7. The subject does not require planned correction of molar tooth positions, posterior bite or molar classic relationship corrections. Subjects with Class II or Class III malocclusions requiring posterior bite / class correction are not eligible. 8. Subjects without prior orthodontic treatment within the past 18 months. 9. Subjects who are periodontally stable. 10. Subjects without a known history of plastic allergies. 11. Subjects who have not had or do not require tooth extractions in preparation for orthodontic treatment with aligners. 12. Subjects with a treatment plan that does not include the use of elastics.

Exclusion criteria

1. Unlikely to be able to comply with clinical study procedures according to Investigator's judgement. 2. Unable or unwilling to return for follow-up visits. 3. Previous enrolment in the present clinical study. 4. Involvement in the planning and conduct of the clinical study (applies to both Sponsor personnel and the clinical study site) 5. Participation in another clinical study that may interfere with the present clinical study. 6. Subjects who have active carries, where there is no plan to correct them prior to the start of aligner therapy. 7. Other dental or clinical pathologies, which in the judgment of the Investigator, deem the candidates inappropriate for participation in the study (e.g. clinically significant periodontal disease or gingivitis, interproximal decay, etc.). 8. The subject require interproximal reduction or attachments to obtain a corrected malocclusion. 9. In addition to the criteria listed above, this product is contraindicated for use in adult and adolescent subjects presenting with the following dental conditions: * Active periodontal disease * Severe open bite or severe overjet * Tooth malocclusion requiring surgical correction * Subject with mixed dentition * Subject with a skeletally narrow jaw * Dental prosthetics/implants or significant number of missing teeth 10. Known pregnancy, pregnancy tests will be performed as per local requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) IndexFrom day 0 (Treatment start) up to 8 months post treatment start (Final visit)Comparison between actual vs planned tooth movements, compared between the investigational treatment and the control device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Satisfaction With the TreatmentAt the final visit (2-8 months post day 0)Overall subject satisfaction with the treatment assessed by a questionnaire using a rating scale from 1 to 10 (1 very satisfied - 10 very unsatisfied).
Dentist (Investigator) Satisfaction With the TreatmentAt the final visit (2-8 months post day 0)Overall dentist (investigator) satisfaction with the treatment assessed by a questionnaire using a rating scale from 1 to 10 (1 very satisfied - 10 very unsatisfied).
Subject Self-reported Pain/DiscomfortAt each follow-up visit (Follow-up visits every 4-6 weeks post Day 0 during a 2-8 months period) and at the final visit (Day 0 + 2-8 months).The subject self-reported values pertaining to pain/discomfort during treatment and comfort in wearing the aligners captured in a questionnaire with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with a Wong Baker face scale (score 0-10), where a higher score corresponds to a higher level of pain/discomfort.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This study was terminated early. At time of study termination seven (7) subjects had been consented (started), out of which only one subject had been randomised and allocated a treatment arm (Treatment Start Visit). To report the six (6) subjects not yet assigned a treatment arm at time of early study termination, an additional Arm Treatment Not assigned was included.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aligners
Either Nighttime Aligners worn 10-12 hours per day or night, or daytime aligners worn 20-22 hours day and night
7
Total7

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyEarly study termination106

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAligners
Age, Continuous32.4 Years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10 / 00 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 10 / 00 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10 / 00 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index

Comparison between actual vs planned tooth movements, compared between the investigational treatment and the control device

Time frame: From day 0 (Treatment start) up to 8 months post treatment start (Final visit)

Population: No subject conducted the final visit prior to early study termination. Consequently, no outcome data has been obtained in the study for this outcome and can thus not be presented.

Secondary

Dentist (Investigator) Satisfaction With the Treatment

Overall dentist (investigator) satisfaction with the treatment assessed by a questionnaire using a rating scale from 1 to 10 (1 very satisfied - 10 very unsatisfied).

Time frame: At the final visit (2-8 months post day 0)

Population: No subject conducted the final visit prior to early study termination. Consequently, no outcome data has been obtained in the study for this outcome and can thus not be presented.

Secondary

Subject Satisfaction With the Treatment

Overall subject satisfaction with the treatment assessed by a questionnaire using a rating scale from 1 to 10 (1 very satisfied - 10 very unsatisfied).

Time frame: At the final visit (2-8 months post day 0)

Population: No subject conducted the final visit prior to early study termination. Consequently, no outcome data has been obtained in the study for this outcome and can thus not be presented.

Secondary

Subject Self-reported Pain/Discomfort

The subject self-reported values pertaining to pain/discomfort during treatment and comfort in wearing the aligners captured in a questionnaire with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with a Wong Baker face scale (score 0-10), where a higher score corresponds to a higher level of pain/discomfort.

Time frame: At each follow-up visit (Follow-up visits every 4-6 weeks post Day 0 during a 2-8 months period) and at the final visit (Day 0 + 2-8 months).

Population: All subjects allocated a treatment arm (one subject in total).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Nighttime AlignersSubject Self-reported Pain/DiscomfortVisit 1. Between this visit and the previous visit, how comfortable are the aligners to wear9 score on a scale
Nighttime AlignersSubject Self-reported Pain/DiscomfortVisit 2. Between this visit and the previous visit, how comfortable are the aligners to wear9 score on a scale
Nighttime AlignersSubject Self-reported Pain/DiscomfortVisit 3. Between this visit and the previous visit, how comfortable are the aligners to wear0 score on a scale
Nighttime AlignersSubject Self-reported Pain/DiscomfortVisit 1. Pain associated with new tooth movement between this visit and the previous visit0 score on a scale
Nighttime AlignersSubject Self-reported Pain/DiscomfortVisit 2. Pain associated with new tooth movement between this visit and the previous visit0 score on a scale
Nighttime AlignersSubject Self-reported Pain/DiscomfortVisit 3. Pain associated with new tooth movement between this visit and the previous visit0 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026