Skip to content

Comparison of Architectural and Performance Adaptations of Hip Extension Exercise Under Gravitational or Inertial Loading Conditions

Comparison of Architectural and Performance Adaptations of Hip Extension Exercise Under Gravitational or Inertial Loading Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06538467
Enrollment
32
Registered
2024-08-05
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Injury;Sports

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to investigate training-induced adaptations in Biceps femoris long head (BFlh) architecture and performance measures such as muscle strength, jumping, and power variables after following 6 weeks of resistance training program with gravitational or inertial hip extension (HE) exercise and a subsequent detraining period, comparing those adaptations with a control group. In addition, this study aims to determine the time course of BFlh architectural adaptations throughout a 6-week training intervention.

Interventions

OTHERHip extension exercise with inertial load

Hip extension exercise with inertial load

OTHERHip extension exercise with gravitational load

Hip extension exercise with gravitational load

Sponsors

University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* at least two years of resistance training experience * not have any injury, disease or pain that could reduce their maximal effort

Exclusion criteria

* history of injury to the lower limbs (including the hamstrings), wrist, or back in the past 18 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fascicle lengthBaseline, at weeks 2 and 3 of the intervention, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)Two-dimensional images of the Biceps femoris long head (BFlh) architecture were captured using B-mode ultrasonography. All imaging was conducted with participants lying prone with their hips and knees in a neutral and fully extended position.Three ultrasound images were taken and stored for analysis through the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA). The most visible fascicle in each image was used for measurement of fascicle pennation angle (i.e., angle between the fascicle and the intermediate aponeurosis) and estimation of fascicle length using a validated equation: FL = sin (AA + 90°) × MT ÷ sin (180° - (AA + 180° - PA))
Muscle Strength AssessmentBaseline, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)Knee flexion was assessed with subjects in prone position performing knee flexor maximal isometrics contractions with a knee angle of approximately 15 degrees. For hip extension, a resisted hip extension was requested with the subjects lying in the prone position with their legs straight. Hip adduction was evaluated in a supine position with the hips at 45º flexion, requesting an maximal isometrics contraction adduction with a resistance in the internal condyle.
Jump performanceBaseline, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)CMJ and SJ, utilizing the MyJump 2 application on an iPad Pro (at 240 frames per second, high-definition video resolution). In the CMJ, participants initiated the jump from a standing position, performed a preparatory movement by bending their knees to 90° flexion, and then jumped upward as high as possible without pausing between movements. Similarly, for the SJ, participants began from a standardized position with knees flexed at 90°, and then jumped as high as possible with hands on their hips. Throughout both tests, participants were instructed to maintain their hands on their hips to minimize lateral and horizontal displacement, ensuring accurate vertical jump measurement.
PowerBaseline, at the end of the 6 weeks of training and 4 weeks after this (detraining period)Power was calculated in both modalities (i.e., HE gravitational and inertial) as the product of velocity and force. The velocity was calculated using the MuscleLab 4020e linear encoder (Ergotest Technology AS, Porsgrunn, Norway). For gravitational loading (i.e. constant mass), the force was calculated as the product of mass and acceleration. For inertial loading, the force was calculated using a force gauge that was anchored along the rope, between a pulley and the proximal end of the second rope.
SorenessFrom session 1 (the beginning of week 1) to session 12 (the end of week 6), at the beginning and end of each session.Participants were asked How sore do you feel in your hamstrings? and rated their soreness on a 10-point Likert Scale (1 = No Soreness, 3 = Minimal Soreness, 5 = Moderate Soreness, 8 = Very Sore, 10 = Extremely Sore)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026