Skip to content

Comparison of Post Facilitation Stretch Versus Reciprocal Inhibition in Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Post Facilitation Stretch Versus Reciprocal Inhibition in Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06534853
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-08-02
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2025-01-30
Last updated
2024-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome

Brief summary

This study is a randomised control trial and the purpose of this study is to determine the effects Post facilitation stretch versus reciprocal inhibition on pain, lumbar range of motion, apparent leg length discrepancy and lumbar lordotic angle in Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to determine the difference between Post facilitation, stretch versus reciprocal inhibition on pain, lumbar range of motion, apparent leg length discrepancy and lumber lordotic angle in Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome. The individual of Age 18-35 years among both genders, who experiences pain of 3 ≤ on NPRS from at least 3 months and whose pain decreases on supine lying; along with any two of the following findings positive of quadratus lumborum on physical examination i.e., Taut bands, Local tenderness, Patient's pain recognition, Pain referral to greater trochanter, Local twitch response & Jump sign will be recruited in the study as patients of Quadratus lumborum syndrome. Pain levels will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Inclinometer will be used for measuring lumber ranges. To assess apparent leg length discrepancy measuring tape will be used. The lumbar lordotic angle will be measured using 60 cm flexible ruler. Participants of interest would be approached and explained about the research. Informed written consent will be taken. It is a non-blinded study and randomization will be done through sealed envelope. Both groups will receive conventional intervention. Additionally, Group A will receive quadratus lumborum post facilitation stretches while Group B will receive Reciprocal inhibition. Baseline and post intervention scores would be recorded for both groups.

Interventions

The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position with the affected side up and a Dutchman's roll or pillow under the iliac crest. Positioned at the edge of the table, the patient's inferior leg is flexed with the foot at the table's edge. The patient grasps the headpiece of the table with the superior hand, allowing the superior leg to drop off the back of the table.The therapist stands behind the patient, providing support to prevent posterior pelvic rotation with their thigh behind the pelvis. The cephalad hand grasps the top of the iliac crest and applies a caudad force, while the caudad hand gently guides the affected leg without generating force.The patient hikes the hip against the resistance from the therapist's cephalad hand, creating an isometric contraction for 5-10 seconds. The patient then relaxes, followed by a rapid stretch held for 10 seconds until the next barrier is reached. This procedure is repeated 3-5 times.

The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position with the affected side up and a Dutchman's roll or pillow under the iliac crest. Positioned at the edge of the table, the patient's inferior leg is flexed with the foot at the table's edge. The patient grasps the headpiece of the table with the superior hand, allowing the superior leg to drop off the back of the table.The therapist stands behind the patient, providing support to prevent posterior pelvic rotation with their thigh behind the pelvis. The cephalad hand grasps the top of the iliac crest and applies a caudad force, while the caudad hand gently guides the affected leg without generating force.The patient hikes the hip against the resistance from the therapist's cephalad hand, creating an isometric contraction for 5-10 seconds. The patient then relaxes, followed by a rapid stretch held for 10 seconds until the next barrier is reached. This procedure is repeated 3-5 times.

OTHERConventional Physical Therapy

A comprehensive therapeutic regimen that includes a 10-minute session of hot pack therapy specifically targeted at the low back region. In addition to this, participants will receive trigger point release therapy to alleviate muscle tension.The treatment plan also incorporates a tailored exercise protocol designed to enhance back health and strength. This protocol includes: 1. Back isometric exercises 2. Bridging exercises 3. Cat and camel stretches 4. Prone press-ups 5. Abductor strengthening exercises

Sponsors

Foundation University Islamabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized control trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-35 years * Both genders * Having pain of ≤ 8 on NPRS from at least 3 months * Pain decreases on supine lying * Any two of the following findings positive of unilateral quadratus lumborum on physical examination: 1. Taut bands 2. Local tenderness 3. Patient's pain recognition 4. Pain referral to greater trochanter 5. Local twitch response

Exclusion criteria

* Painful isometric muscle testing of hip flexors, abductors, adductors, and extensors * Previous surgery of lower limb * Centralization/peripheralization * Lower back trauma * Positive SLR * Radiculopathy * Fracture/surgery of pelvic and/or hip region * Diagnosed fibromyalgia or other rheumatic diseases. * Lactating women * Intrauterine device * Pregnant women * Use of psychiatric medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lumbar Range of Motion (ROM)2 weeksIt will measured using inclinometer
Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD)2 weeksMeasure the distance between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the medial malleolus.This method, referred to as the direct clinical method for measuring LLD, provides the apparent leg length discrepancy.
Lumbar Lordotic Angle2 weeksIt will be measured using Flexible Ruler
Pain intensity2 weeksPain is assessed by using numeric main rating scale comparing pre and post pain intensity. This is 11- point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g., no pain) to '10' representing the other pain extreme

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactAqsa Ayaz, MS-MSKPT*
aqsaayaz77@gmail.com03365765782

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026