Skip to content

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions After 10 Years of Function

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions. A Retrospective Study With a Follow-up of at Least 10 Years.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06534398
Acronym
Cantilevers
Enrollment
19
Registered
2024-08-02
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2024-07-30
Last updated
2024-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implants

Keywords

Dental implants, cantilever extension, biologic complications, technical complications

Brief summary

A retrospective examination was performed on patients who had received treatment with dental implants supporting a prosthesis with a cantilever extension for at least 10 years of function.

Detailed description

The successful use of osseointegrated dental implants in replacing missing teeth has been adequately documented, with multiple studies reporting long-term success exceeding 10 years of function. However, there is still insufficient evidence in cases where availability of adequate bone precludes ideal placement of implants. Examples of cases like these include the posterior maxilla when pneumatization of the maxillary sinus does not allow for placement of implants, or areas of thin bone that would require extensive guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques and increase patient morbidity. In such cases the use of fixed dental prostheses (FDPC's) with cantilever extension has been suggested in lieu of sinus lift techniques or GBR procedures. However, few studies have actually addressed the long-term success of such FDPC's, both from a surgical and a prosthetic standpoint, especially in posterior areas of the mandible and maxilla where loading forces are expected to be higher. Two studies addressed this issue in the early 2000's with successful outcomes reported for an observation period of 5 years. Others reported similar outcomes after a mean observation period of 5.6 years. The 5th Consensus Conference of the European Association of Osseointegration (EAO) suggested that such treatment can be recommended to patients, albeit with little available evidence and limited follow-up of cases. Recent studies have delved further into this issue, offering longer follow-up data of more than 10 years of function. They included both 2 unit FDP's anchored on one implant and 3 unit FDP's anchored on two implants with cantilever extensions. They concluded that this treatment modality is a reliable option with long-term stability and few complications, mainly prosthetic. The aim of this retrospective study is to offer further data on the long-term success and complications when at least two dental implants are used to support a FDPC in the posterior areas of both jaws, after at least 10 years of function.

Interventions

DEVICEDental implant prosthesis with cantilever extension

A retrospective study on the radiographic and clinical findings of implant-supported dental prostheses with cantilever extensions in place and function for at least 10 years

Sponsors

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: * Age 18 years and over * Systemic health or controlled medical conditions * Periodontal health, either no periodontal disease, or previously treated periodontal disease and under a supportive periodontal maintenance (SPT) program * Smokers were included but encouraged to enter a smoking cessation program * Patients with bruxism or parafunctional habits were included. The

Exclusion criteria

were as follows: * Uncontrolled medical conditions * Active uncontrolled periodontal disease * Inability to present for the reevaluation appointment * Immediate implant placement * Cantilever units that were part of full-arch restorations * Cantilever units that were connected to a single implant * Non-existent opposing dentition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean bone loss10 years at leastMean bone loss measured from the difference of the bone levels at time of implant placement compared to the time of examination

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Probing Depth10 years at leastThe average probing depth at the time of examination at each implant site
Biologic complications10 years at leastRecording of biologic complications around implants (health, peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis
Technical complications10 years at leastRecording of prosthetic complications encountered at the dental prostheses with cantilever extensions

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026