Skip to content

A Study to Learn About the Benefit of Rimegepant Versus Triptans in Migraine Buddy App Users.

Evaluation of Satisfaction With Rimegepant and Triptans Utilizing Migraine Buddy Retrospective Data

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06532357
Enrollment
1536
Registered
2024-08-01
Start date
2024-06-09
Completion date
2024-06-10
Last updated
2025-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine

Keywords

acute treatment of migraine, rimegepant, triptans, Migraine Buddy App Users

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to collect information of the US users from the Migraine Buddy app between 20 October 2023 and 20 May 2024. Patients who used Nurtec and/or triptans as an acute treatment for migraine, with or without a background of preventive treatment (anti-CGRP, Botox or oral migraine preventive medications) and completed a survey were eligible for this study. Acute treatment is a short-term treatment. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to learn about the user´s satisfaction with Nurtec or the triptan. The level of satisfaction with Nurtec will be compared to the level of satisfaction with triptans. The benefit of this study is the real-life setting of the information collected. This means that the users were using the Migraine Buddy app for tracking their migraines in real life.

Detailed description

This study will utilize retrospective data collected with the Migraine Buddy Mobile application to evaluate satisfaction of treatment with rimegepant and triptans. The study population for this study is Migraine Buddy users in the US who answered a survey about their acute treatments, displayed on the home page of the app. It generates reports that users can share with their doctors to help them establish a diagnosis and/or optimize treatment. For this retrospective study, only questions related to treatment satisfaction will be analyzed. Users complete the satisfaction questions only once for each current acute migraine treatment. If a patient is using more than one acute treatment, they will be able to complete satisfaction questions for each acute treatment. Approximately two-thirds of the app users are currently using both rimegepant and triptans to acutely treat their migraine attacks. Questions are worded such that they ask specifically about the acute treatment e.g., Nurtec. For the surveys used in the 7-month time frame of this retrospective study, feasibility assessment showed that participants answered the satisfaction questions for a specific acute medication only once, in 97% of the cases. For the few users who responded to 2 or more waves of identical surveys, the most recent answer will be used for the analysis. Data was gathered between October 20, 2023 & May 20, 2024, from users of the Migraine Buddy app through the diary tracking and the satisfaction questions were administered via survey and via the interactive data collection tool named Taylor. All the data will be extracted from the Aptar Digital Health (ADH) platform existing database to perform the analysis described in this protocol.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who used Nurtec and/or triptans as an acute treatment for migraine, with or without a background of preventive treatment (anti-CGRP, Botox or oral migraine preventive medications). * Male or female participants with migraine * Having consented to the anonymous use of their data for research * Currently using Nurtec and/or triptans to treat migraine attacks

Exclusion criteria

* Users who did not report using either medication for which they complete the survey within 60 days prior to the survey.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain IntensityUp to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single dayParticipants responded about satisfaction with treatment for pain intensity using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.
Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack DurationUp to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single dayParticipants responded about satisfaction with of attack duration using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.
Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of ActionUp to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single dayParticipants responded about satisfaction with speed of action using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.
Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive ImpactUp to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single dayParticipants responded about satisfaction with migraine-Induced cognitive impact using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.
Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other SymptomsUp to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single dayParticipants responded about satisfaction with relief of other symptoms using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment. Other symptoms included following parameters: photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light/sound/odors).
Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of TolerabilityUp to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single dayParticipants responded about satisfaction of tolerability using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In this study, data was gathered between 30 October 2023 to 20 May 2024 from users of the Migraine Buddy application in the US who answered a survey about their acute treatments (rimegepant, or triptans) for migraine, displayed on the home page of the application. For the purpose of this retrospective study, only questions related to treatment satisfaction were analyzed.

Pre-assignment details

As pre-specified, only variables/data collected were the self-reported satisfaction of Migraine Buddy users via a questionnaire accessible from the home screen of the application. Users completed the satisfaction questions only once for each current acute migraine treatment. A total of 1536 participants were enrolled in this study who completed the survey. There were few participants who were not exclusive and completed survey for both rimegepant and triptans.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rimegepant
This arm included participants who used Migraine buddy application and answered the survey about satisfaction with rimegepant. No intervention was administered in this study.
0
Triptans
This arm included participants who used Migraine buddy application and answered the survey about satisfaction with Triptans. No intervention was administered in this study.
0
Total0

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
— Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
— Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain Intensity

Participants responded about satisfaction with treatment for pain intensity using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.

Time frame: Up to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single day

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were retrieved and observed in the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain IntensitySatisfied539 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain IntensityNeutral130 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain IntensityDissatisfied39 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain IntensitySatisfied625 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain IntensityNeutral178 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Pain IntensityDissatisfied42 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of Tolerability

Participants responded about satisfaction of tolerability using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.

Time frame: Up to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single day

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were retrieved and observed in the study. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of TolerabilitySatisfied385 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of TolerabilityNeutral50 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of TolerabilityDissatisfied12 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of TolerabilitySatisfied554 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of TolerabilityNeutral229 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction of TolerabilityDissatisfied62 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive Impact

Participants responded about satisfaction with migraine-Induced cognitive impact using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.

Time frame: Up to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single day

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were retrieved and observed in the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive ImpactSatisfied430 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive ImpactNeutral237 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive ImpactDissatisfied41 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive ImpactSatisfied384 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive ImpactNeutral377 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Migraine-Induced Cognitive ImpactDissatisfied84 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack Duration

Participants responded about satisfaction with of attack duration using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.

Time frame: Up to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single day

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were retrieved and observed in the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack DurationSatisfied524 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack DurationNeutral145 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack DurationDissatisfied39 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack DurationSatisfied571 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack DurationNeutral222 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With of Attack DurationDissatisfied52 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other Symptoms

Participants responded about satisfaction with relief of other symptoms using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment. Other symptoms included following parameters: photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light/sound/odors).

Time frame: Up to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single day

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were retrieved and observed in the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other SymptomsSatisfied418 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other SymptomsNeutral243 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other SymptomsDissatisfied47 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other SymptomsSatisfied478 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other SymptomsNeutral301 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Relief of Other SymptomsDissatisfied66 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of Action

Participants responded about satisfaction with speed of action using following responses: extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, extremely dissatisfied. Based on participants responses, the respondents were grouped into those who were satisfied (reported extremely satisfied/ satisfied/ slightly satisfied), neutral (reported neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) or dissatisfied (reported slightly dissatisfied/ dissatisfied/ extremely dissatisfied) with the treatment.

Time frame: Up to 60 days post last usage of treatment (from retrospective data collection period of 7 months); available retrospective data was evaluated in this observational study of a single day

Population: Analysis population included all eligible participants whose data were retrieved and observed in the study.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of ActionSatisfied506 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of ActionNeutral154 Participants
RimegepantNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of ActionDissatisfied48 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of ActionSatisfied524 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of ActionNeutral272 Participants
TriptansNumber of Participants Classified as Per Responses for Satisfaction With Speed of ActionDissatisfied49 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026