Skip to content

Does the Format of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Impact the Results

Does the Format of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Impact the Results: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06530758
Enrollment
587
Registered
2024-07-31
Start date
2024-07-29
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Brief summary

The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale v1.1 (ASRS) is frequently used in family medicine clinics to screen for ADHD. Numerous studies have found the ASRS has a low positive predictive value. Compounding this concern is the format of the ASRS. Specifically, the answers on the ASRS that lead to screen positive results are shaded in gray and grouped together, which may make it easy for patients to discern which responses should be selected for a positive screen.

Detailed description

The ASRS is used widely to screen for ADHD in adults. It has 18 questions, with response options "never," "rarely," "sometimes," "often," and "very often." The 6 questions considered most predictive of ADHD are grouped together in Part A and questions that are meant to provide additional cues are grouped together in Part B. The options that are considered a positive response vary between questions; for some questions the option is at least "sometimes," while for others it is at least "often." The positive response options are shaded on the ASRS. A person is considered to have a positive screen if 4 of the 6 questions in Part A are positive. The objective of this trial is to determine if the shading and grouping on the ASRS impacts screening results. This trial has a 2x2 factorial design set in a family medicine clinic(s). When a patients check in for an appointment, clinic staff will offer them a survey that includes 1) demographic questions and 2) 1 of the 4 versions of the ASRS, the version they receive is randomized (with programming). Most patients will take approximately 5 minutes to complete the survey prior to them seeing the family physician.

Interventions

OTHERAltered ASRS format, without shading and with grouping

Participants will be asked to complete the ASRS form without shading and with grouping.

OTHERAltered ASRS format, with shading and without grouping

Participants will be asked to complete the ASRS form with shading and without grouping.

OTHERAltered ASRS format, without shading and without grouping

Participants will be asked to complete the ASRS form without shading and without grouping.

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 19 - 65 years old * Patients who are registering for their appointment at the family medicine clinic * Patients who are expected to be in the reception area for ≥5 minutes before going to a clinic room

Exclusion criteria

* Any patients who do not have the capacity to complete the form (e.g., cognitive impairment, unable to read English, unable to use a computer)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Screen positive rateThrough study completion, estimated to be 2 monthsPoisson regression to determine the relative risk of a screen positive among the different versions of the form. We will include the following covariates: shading, grouping, shading x grouping, suspect ADHD without diagnosis, ADHD diagnosis, sex, and age.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRoni Kraut

University of Alberta

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026