Skip to content

The Role of Maintaining External Carotid Artery Flow in Graft Interposition After Carotid Endarterectomy

The Role of Maintaining External Carotid Artery Flow in Graft Interposition After Carotid Endarterectomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06528717
Acronym
AGICS
Enrollment
250
Registered
2024-07-30
Start date
2024-06-12
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2024-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Diseases, Carotid Atherosclerosis, Stroke

Brief summary

Analyzing results of carotid graft interposition with and without flow preservation through external carotid artery after endarterectomy.

Detailed description

Surgical and endovascular treatment have been shown as effective treatment modalities in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients at high risk of stroke on medical therapy with significant carotid artery stenosis. Eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) has proven effective as a surgical treatment modality. In highly selected instances carotid bypass may be indicated as a bailout procedure or primarily as a preoperatively planned maneuver. Usually, the decision for substitution of carotid bifurcation with a synthetic graft is made due to an extensive, severe atherosclerotic process on the distal part of the extracranial internal carotid artery, the presence of uncontrollable atherosclerotic plaque after endarterectomy, and in cases when an exceptionally thin artery wall remains after endarterectomy. Several techniques have been described for substituting carotid bifurcation with a synthetic graft. The most common technique involves complete resection and excision of the carotid bifurcation and reconstruction with graft interposition between the undiseased segment of the common carotid artery (CCA) proximally and the internal carotid artery (ICA) distally by creating proximal and distal end-to-end anastomoses. This technique requires ligation and exclusion of the external carotid (ECA) and the superior thyroid artery from circulation. The less common techniques that preserve flow through the external carotid artery are performed as a primary option for treatment without previous endarterectomy and are seldom applied. Currently, there are no recommendations regarding the administration of carotid bypass, nor comparisons of these techniques. In this study, the investigators are comparing a technique with graft interposition between endarterectomized CCA (creation of side-to-end anastomosis) and the distal segment of the ICA (end-to-end anastomosis) after failure of eCEA to provide technical success with the described common interposition by end-to-end anastomoses proximally and distally. Therefore, the role of flow preservation through the ECA could be defined.

Interventions

PROCEDURECarotid graft interposition

In patients with extensive atherosclerotic carotid disease, when endarterectomy isn't feasible, replacement of the carotid artery with a graft is needed. Graft interposition can be performed either by end-to-end proximal and distal anastomoses in the undiseased common and internal carotid artery with ligation of the external carotid artery, or by side-to-end proximal anastomosis on the origin of the internal carotid artery and end-to-end distal anastomosis on the internal carotid artery with flow preservation in the external carotid artery.

Sponsors

Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* symptomatic carotid stenosis (\> 50%) * unilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis (\> 60%) * bilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis (\> 60%)

Exclusion criteria

* carotid restenosis * major surgery in previous 6 months * previous brain trauma or surgery * malignant disease * epilepsy * carotid artery aneurysm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
periprocedural stroke and death30 daysonset of new neurological deficit or death during perioperative period
myocardial infarction30 daysdevelopment of new acute coronary events during perioperative period
stroke ipsilateral to the procedurethrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsdevelopment of new neurological events that are pathophysiological atributable to the operated side

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
restenosis ratethrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsrestenosis after graft placement diagnosed by color Doppler sonographic examination or by multiplanar detection computerized tomography angiography
graft patencythrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsprimary and primary assisted
patient survivalthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsdefining cause of death

Countries

Serbia

Contacts

Primary ContactSlobodan Pesic, MD
spesic90@gmail.com00381616303360
Backup ContactJovan Petrovic, MD
jovanpetrovic1997@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026