Skip to content

Digital Obturators in Maxillectomy Cases

Evaluation of Digital Versus Conventional Roofless Obturators in Partial Maxillectomy Cases

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06527053
Enrollment
7
Registered
2024-07-30
Start date
2021-12-21
Completion date
2024-01-07
Last updated
2024-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Device Malfunction

Keywords

digital obturators-roofless design-maxillectomy-mucorycosis

Brief summary

Using Digital approach to treat patients with maxillofacial defects without surgical intervention

Detailed description

Evaluating digital dental and maxillofacial obturators to artifitially close maxillofacial defects in paients with oral cancer and patients with mucormycosis fungal post covid infection. Craeting Digitized database for all patients included in the study. Recording casses with post covid infection in specific period.

Interventions

DEVICEobturator

special maxillofacial device to close hollow defects

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Intervention model description

patients with maxillary defects had received two types of obturators

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- All participants in this study will be selected according to the following criteria: * Patients with maxillary defects Class I and class II Aramany Classification with completely healed tissues. * Patients' age ranging from 20 to 70 years old. * Nearly intact mandibular arch.

Exclusion criteria

\- Participants with the following criteria will be excluded from the study: * Physical or mental instability. * Completely edentulous patients. * Patients presenting allergy to materials being used. * Patients lacking compliance to maintain acceptable oral hygiene. * Patients taking radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of hypernasality in speechone monthphysiologic parameter
Evaluation of masseter muscle musclethree monthsphysiologic parameter
Evaluation of Patient Quality of Lifesix monthsquestionnaire
Evaluation of retention1 day (at time of device insertion)descriptive by KP scale
Obturator misfit1 day (at time of device delivery)descriptive by Digital software

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026